Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076485›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2020

Prevalence and clinical significance of VHL mutations and 3p25 deletions in renal tumor subtypes.

Franziska Büscheck, Christoph Fraune, Ronald Simon, Martina Kluth, Claudia Hube-Magg, Christina Möller-Koop, Imren Sarper, Kathrin Ketterer, Tjark Henke, Christian Eichelberg and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Renal Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Napsin A Expression in Human Tumors and Normal Tissues.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Franziska BüscheckInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph FrauneInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martina KluthInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia Hube-MaggInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christina Möller-KoopInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Imren SarperInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Kathrin KettererInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Tjark HenkeInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian EichelbergUrologische Praxis Straubing, Straubing, Germany.
Roland DahlemDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Waldemar WilczakInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Margit FischDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Till EichenauerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael RinkDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate prevalence and clinical impact of VHL mutations and deletions (3p), a cohort of consecutive kidney tumors was analyzed by DNA sequencing and fluorescence PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study includes 1,805 patients with renal tumors who were surgically treated at the Department of Urology at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 1994 and 2015. The cohort included 1,176 clear cell, 270 papillary, 101 chromophobe, and 28 clear cell (tubulo) papillary cancers, as well as 149 oncocytomas and 81 less common subtypes.

resultsAmong 431 successfully analyzed tumors, VHL mutations were found in 59.3% of clear cell, 5.2% of papillary, 3.1% of chromophobe carcinomas and in 7.3% of oncocytomas as well as in the rare kidney tumor types (25%-60%). FISH analysis was successful in 1,403 cases. 3p25 deletion was found in 57.2% of clear cell, 17.6% of papillary, 17.7% of chromophobe carcinomas and in 11.9% of oncocytomas as well as in the rare kidney tumor types (16.7%-50%). No statistically significant associations between VHL mutation/deletion and tumor grade, stage, and clinical outcome was found. Only in the subgroup of papillary cancers, 3p deletion was significantly associated with lymph node and distant metastasis as well as with poor patient outcome (

conclusionsThe presence of a VHL mutation in virtually all renal tumor subtypes suggests that VHL analysis cannot be used to distinguish between renal tumor subtypes. Consequently, anti-VHL treatment strategies should not be limited to patients with clear cell cancer.

Indexed as

3p copy numberfluorescence in-situ hybridizationrenal cell tumorsVHL mutationvon Hippel-Lindau gene

Identifiers

PMID32076485
PMCPMC6980626
OpenAlexW3001263886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.