Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076034›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Chamber volume development, metabolic rates, and selective extinction in cephalopods.

Amane Tajika, Neil H Landman, René Hoffmann, Robert Lemanis, Naoki Morimoto, Christina Ifrim, Christian Klug

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anatomy and size ofSwiss journal of palaeontology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Amane TajikaDivision of Paleontology (Invertebrates), American Museum of Natural History, Central Part West 79th Street, New York, NY, 10024, USA. atajika@amnh.org.
Neil H LandmanDivision of Paleontology (Invertebrates), American Museum of Natural History, Central Part West 79th Street, New York, NY, 10024, USA.
René HoffmannInstitut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Geophysik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, 44801, Germany.
Robert LemanisBCUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Naoki MorimotoLaboratory of Physical Anthropology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, 606-8502, Kyoto, Japan.
Christina IfrimInstitut für Geowissenschaften, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 234/Raum 217, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian KlugPaläontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich, Karl-Schmid-Strasse 4, Zürich, 8006, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4099-7453
American Museum of Natural History · USCenter for Systems Biology Dresden · DEHeidelberg University · DEKyoto University · JPRuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructing the physiology of extinct organisms is key to understanding mechanisms of selective extinction during biotic crises. Soft tissues of extinct organisms are rarely preserved and, therefore, a proxy for physiological aspects is needed. Here, we examine whether cephalopod conchs yield information about their physiology by assessing how the formation of chambers respond to external stimuli such as environmental changes. We measured chamber volume through ontogeny to detect differences in the pattern of chamber volume development in nautilids, coleoids, and ammonoids. Results reveal that the differences between ontogenetic trajectories of these cephalopods involve the presence or absence of abrupt decreases of chamber volume. Accepting the link between metabolic rate and growth, we assume that this difference is rooted in metabolic rates that differ between cephalopod clades. High metabolic rates combined with small hatching size in ammonoids as opposed to lower metabolic rates and much larger hatchlings in most nautilids may explain the selective extinction of ammonoids as a consequence of low food availability at the end of the Cretaceous.

Indexed as

Basal MetabolismExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsCephalopodaFossils

Identifiers

PMID32076034
PMCPMC7031508
OpenAlexW3008899454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.