Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076005›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Deducing signaling pathways from parallel actions of arsenite and antimonite in human epidermal keratinocytes.

Marjorie A Phillips, Angela Cánovas, Miguel A Rea, Alma Islas-Trejo, Juan F Medrano, Blythe Durbin-Johnson, David M Rocke, Robert H Rice

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marjorie A PhillipsDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Angela CánovasCentre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Miguel A ReaDepartment of Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Alma Islas-TrejoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Juan F MedranoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Blythe Durbin-JohnsonDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clinical and Translational Science Center Biostatistics Core, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
David M RockeDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clinical and Translational Science Center Biostatistics Core, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Robert H RiceDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. rhrice@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · USAutonomous University of Queretaro · MXUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inorganic arsenic oxides have been identified as carcinogens in several human tissues, including epidermis. Due to the chemical similarity between trivalent inorganic arsenic (arsenite) and antimony (antimonite), we hypothesized that common intracellular targets lead to similarities in cellular responses. Indeed, transcriptional and proteomic profiling revealed remarkable similarities in differentially expressed genes and proteins resulting from exposure of cultured human epidermal keratinocytes to arsenite and antimonite in contrast to comparisons of arsenite with other metal compounds. These data were analyzed to predict upstream regulators and affected signaling pathways following arsenite and antimonite treatments. A majority of the top findings in each category were identical after treatment with either compound. Inspection of the predicted upstream regulators led to previously unsuspected roles for oncostatin M, corticosteroids and ephrins in mediating cellular response. The influence of these predicted mediators was then experimentally verified. Together with predictions of transcription factor effects more generally, the analysis has led to model signaling networks largely accounting for arsenite and antimonite action. The striking parallels between responses to arsenite and antimonite indicate the skin carcinogenic risk of exposure to antimonite merits close scrutiny.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntimonyArsenitesColony-Forming Units AssayEphrinsEpidermisGene Expression ProfilingHumansKeratinocytesOncostatin MRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsAdrenal Cortex HormonesantimoniteAntimonyarseniteArsenitesEphrinsOncostatin MRNA, MessengerTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID32076005
PMCPMC7031270
OpenAlexW3008197546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.