ArticleBMJ open2020
High-flow nasal oxygenation versus standard oxygenation for gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation. The prospective multicentre randomised controlled ODEPHI study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03829293 (High-Flow Nasal Oxygenation Versus Standard Oxygenation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy With Sedation. A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
High-Flow Nasal Oxygenation Versus Standard Oxygenation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy With Sedation. A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs. Standard Nasal Oxygen in Preventing Hypoxia During Procedural Sedation in Minor and Moderate Burn Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Article
- HFNC Oxygen Therapy vs COT in Prolonged Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Inside the ICU: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in prolonged upper GI endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023Article
- Clinical review of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in human and veterinary patients.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHypoxaemia is a major complication during gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) procedures (upper/lower) when performed under deep sedation in the procedure room. Standard oxygen therapy (SOT) is used to prevent hypoxaemia. Data suggest that risk factors for hypoxaemia under deep sedation during GIE are obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, a body mass index above 30 kg/m², high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, age over 60 years old, high American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class and the association of upper and lower GIE. High-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) may potentially improve oxygenation during GIE under deep sedation. We hypothesised that HFNO could decrease the incidence of hypoxaemia in comparison with SOT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ODEPHI (High-flow nasal ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the ethics committee (CPP Sud Est Paris V, France), and patients are included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. As provided for by French law, patients participating in the study are informed that they have the possibility to ask the investigators, once the study is completed, to be informed of the overall results of the study. Thus, a summary of the results will be sent by post to the participants on request. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03829293).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.