Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32075828›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2020

Experiences of people taking opioid medication for chronic non-malignant pain: a qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography.

Vivien P Nichols, Francine Toye, Sam Eldabe, Harbinder Kaur Sandhu, Martin Underwood, Kate Seers

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Patients' perspectives about the role of primary healthcare providers in long-term opioid therapy: a qualitative study in Dutch primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Do FIQR Severity Categories and Symptoms, Differentiate Between Continuous, Intermittent and Non-Opioid Users in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia?Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2024
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Patient Perspectives on Opioid Risk Discussions in Primary Care.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vivien P NicholsWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK V.P.Nichols@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3372-1395
Francine ToyePhysiotherapy Research Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
Sam EldabeDepartment of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Harbinder Kaur SandhuWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.
Martin UnderwoodWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.
Kate SeersWarwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.
University of Warwick · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1212-20018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review qualitative studies on the experience of taking opioid medication for chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP) or coming off them.

designThis is a qualitative evidence synthesis using a seven-step approach from the methods of meta-ethnography. DATA SOURCES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We searched selected databases-Medline, Embase, AMED, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus (Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index)-for qualitative studies which provide patients' views of taking opioid medication for CNMP or of coming off them (June 2017, updated September 2018). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Papers were quality appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool, and the GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group - Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) guidelines were applied. We identified concepts and iteratively abstracted these concepts into a line of argument.

resultsWe screened 2994 unique citations and checked 153 full texts, and 31 met our review criteria. We identified five themes: (1) reluctant users with little choice; (2) understanding opioids: the good and the bad; (3) a therapeutic alliance: not always on the same page; (4) stigma: feeling scared and secretive but needing support; and (5) the challenge of tapering or withdrawal. A new overarching theme of 'constantly balancing' emerged from the data.

conclusionsPeople taking opioids were constantly balancing tensions, not always wanting to take opioids, and weighing the pros and cons of opioids but feeling they had no choice because of the pain. They frequently felt stigmatised, were not always 'on the same page' as their healthcare professional and felt changes in opioid use were often challenging. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 49470934; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AttitudeConflict, PsychologicalDrug PrescriptionsEmotionsSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAnalgesics, OpioidAnthropology, CulturalChronic PainComprehensionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchAnalgesics, Opioidchronic non-malignant painmeta-ethnographyopioidpatients’ viewsqualitative evidence synthesisqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32075828
PMCPMC7044883
OpenAlexW3007555441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.