ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2020
Maternal and fetal outcomes following exposure to duloxetine in pregnancy: cohort study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Depression and antidepressant use in pregnancy and adverse maternal and offspring outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Association of antidepressant use during pregnancy and pregnancy-induced hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Use of sensitivity analyses to assess uncontrolled confounding from unmeasured variables in observational, active comparator pharmacoepidemiologic studies: a systematic review.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Pooled it
- The Association of Antidepressants in Late Pregnancy with Postpartum Hemorrhage: Systematic Review of Controlled Observational Studies.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Prenatal exposure to pregabalin, birth outcomes and neurodevelopment - a population-based cohort study in four Nordic countries.Drug safety · 2023Pooled it
- Maternal exposure to SSRIs or SNRIs and the risk of congenital abnormalities in offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Considering the Risk for Congenital Heart Defects of Antidepressant Classes and Individual Antidepressants.Drug safety · 2021Pooled it
- Prenatal exposure to maternal depression and antidepressants and neurodevelopmental outcomes: A population cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Characterizing Perinatal Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Myasthenia Gravis.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Risk assessment of drug-associated miscarriage using XGBoost and SHAP explainability: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- A cautionary note regarding the use of the FDA adverse event reporting system.Archives of women's mental health · 2025Article
- Risk of congenital anomalies associated with psychotropic medications: a review of neonatal reports in the FDA adverse event reporting System (FAERS).Archives of women's mental health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Association Between Postpartum Hemorrhage and Antidepressant Use: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2025Article
- Kidney Function Following COVID-19 in Children and Adolescents.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- A pooled analysis of the efficacy of sertraline in women, with a focus on those of childbearing age.Annals of general psychiatry · 2024Article
- Association between psychopharmacotherapy and postpartum hemorrhage.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- The Effect of Self-Management on Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Post-acute and Chronic Kidney Function Outcomes of COVID-19 in Children and Adolescents: An EHR Cohort Study from the RECOVER Initiative.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Severe Maternal Morbidity and Mental Health Hospitalizations or Emergency Department Visits.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Concepts for selection and utilization of psychiatric medications in pregnancy.The mental health clinician · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the risk of adverse maternal and infant outcomes following in utero exposure to duloxetine.
designCohort study nested in the Medicaid Analytic eXtract for 2004-13.
settingPublicly insured pregnancies in the United States.
participantsPregnant women 18 to 55 years of age and their liveborn infants.
interventionsDuloxetine exposure during the etiologically relevant time window, compared with no exposure to duloxetine, exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, exposure to venlafaxine, and exposure to duloxetine before but not during pregnancy.
main outcome measuresCongenital malformations overall, cardiac malformations, preterm birth, small for gestational age infant, pre-eclampsia, and postpartum hemorrhage.
resultsCohort sizes ranged from 1.3 to 4.1 million, depending on the outcome. The number of women exposed to duloxetine varied by cohort and exposure contrast and was around 2500-3000 for early pregnancy exposure and 900-950 for late pregnancy exposure. The base risk per 1000 unexposed women was 36.6 (95% confidence interval 36.3 to 36.9) for congenital malformations overall, 13.7 (13.5 to 13.9) for cardiovascular malformations, 107.8 (107.3 to 108.3) for preterm birth, 20.4 (20.1 to 20.6) for small for gestational age infant, 33.6 (33.3 to 33.9) for pre-eclampsia, and 23.3 (23.1 to 23.4) for postpartum hemorrhage. After adjustment for measured potential confounding variables, all baseline characteristics were well balanced for all exposure contrasts. In propensity score adjusted analyses versus unexposed pregnancies, the relative risk was 1.11 (95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.33) for congenital malformations overall and 1.29 (0.99 to 1.68) for cardiovascular malformations. For preterm birth, the relative risk was 1.01 (0.92 to 1.10) for early exposure and 1.19 (1.04 to 1.37) for late exposure. For small for gestational age infants the relative risks were 1.14 (0.92 to 1.41) and 1.20 (0.83 to 1.72) for early and late pregnancy exposure, respectively, and for pre-eclampsia they were 1.12 (0.96 to 1.31) and 1.04 (0.80 to 1.35). The relative risk for postpartum hemorrhage was 1.53 (1.08 to 2.18). Results from sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the findings from the main analyses.
conclusionsOn the basis of the evidence available to date, duloxetine is unlikely to be a major teratogen but may be associated with an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage and a small increased risk of cardiac malformations. While continuing to monitor the safety of duloxetine as data accumulate over time, these potential small increases in risk of relatively uncommon outcomes must be weighed against the benefits of treating depression and pain during pregnancy in a given patient.
trial registrationEUPAS 15946.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.