Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32075748›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2020

The Costs of Close Contacts: Visualizing the Energy Landscape of Cell Contacts at the Nanoscale.

Klara Kulenkampff, Anna H Lippert, James McColl, Ana Mafalda Santos, Aleks Ponjavic, Edward Jenkins, Jane Humphrey, Alexander Winkel, Kristian Franze, Steven F Lee and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Trapping or slowing the diffusion of T cell receptors at close contacts initiates T cell signaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Klara KulenkampffDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anna H LippertDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
James McCollDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ana Mafalda SantosRadcliffe Department of Medicine and MRC Human Immunology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Aleks PonjavicDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Edward JenkinsRadcliffe Department of Medicine and MRC Human Immunology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jane HumphreyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alexander WinkelDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kristian FranzeDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Steven F LeeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Simon J DavisRadcliffe Department of Medicine and MRC Human Immunology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David KlenermanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Electronic address: dk10012@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12010/4Wellcome Trust 207547/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-cell contacts often underpin signaling between cells. For immunology, the binding of a T cell receptor to an antigen-presenting pMHC initiates downstream signaling and an immune response. Although this contact is mediated by proteins on both cells creating interfaces with gap sizes typically around 14 nm, many, often contradictory observations have been made regarding the influence of the contact on parameters such as the binding kinetics, spatial distribution, and diffusion of signaling proteins within the contact. Understanding the basic physical constraints on probes inside this crowded environment will help inform studies on binding kinetics and dynamics of signaling of relevant proteins in the synapse. By tracking quantum dots of different dimensions for extended periods of time, we have shown that it is possible to obtain the probability of a molecule entering the contact, the change in its diffusion upon entry, and the impact of spatial heterogeneity of adhesion protein density in the contact. By analyzing the contacts formed by a T cell interacting with adhesion proteins anchored to a supported lipid bilayer, we find that probes are excluded from contact entry in a size-dependent manner for gap-to-probe differences of 4.1 nm. We also observed probes being trapped inside the contact and a decrease in diffusion of up to 85% in dense adhesion protein contacts. This approach provides new, to our knowledge, insights into the nature of cell-cell contacts, revealing that cell contacts are highly heterogeneous because of topography- and protein-density-related processes. These effects are likely to profoundly influence signaling between cells.

Indexed as

Receptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesDiffusionKineticsSignal TransductionReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID32075748
PMCPMC7091464
OpenAlexW3003805724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.