Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32075669›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2020

The exoskeleton expansion: improving walking and running economy.

Gregory S Sawicki, Owen N Beck, Inseung Kang, Aaron J Young

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06041100 (Assessing the Long-term Effects of Wearing a Lower-limb Exoskeleton on Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Pre-frail Adults - a Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 126 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06041100 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Assessing the Long-term Effects of Wearing a Lower-limb Exoskeleton on Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Pre-frail Adults - a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled16ConditionsPre-frail Senior AdultsArmsExoskeleton
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gregory S SawickiThe George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. gregory.sawicki@me.gatech.edu.
Owen N BeckThe George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Inseung KangThe George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Aaron J YoungThe George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. aaron.young@me.gatech.edu.

Funding

NRI: Novel platform for rapid exploration of robotic ankle exoskeleton control stR01NR014756 · NINR · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI KAMPER, DEREK, SAWICKI, GREGORY STEPHEN · 2013 to 2017
$729k
Linking muscle-tendon dynamics and energetics to inform exoskeleton design for improved locomotor economy in aging.F32AG063460 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BECK, OWEN · 2019 to 2021
$151k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG063460NIA NIH HHS F32AG063460NIEHS NIH HHS 27303C0140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the early 2000s, researchers have been trying to develop lower-limb exoskeletons that augment human mobility by reducing the metabolic cost of walking and running versus without a device. In 2013, researchers finally broke this 'metabolic cost barrier'. We analyzed the literature through December 2019, and identified 23 studies that demonstrate exoskeleton designs that improved human walking and running economy beyond capable without a device. Here, we reviewed these studies and highlighted key innovations and techniques that enabled these devices to surpass the metabolic cost barrier and steadily improve user walking and running economy from 2013 to nearly 2020. These studies include, physiologically-informed targeting of lower-limb joints; use of off-board actuators to rapidly prototype exoskeleton controllers; mechatronic designs of both active and passive systems; and a renewed focus on human-exoskeleton interface design. Lastly, we highlight emerging trends that we anticipate will further augment wearable-device performance and pose the next grand challenges facing exoskeleton technology for augmenting human mobility.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansLower ExtremityMaleRoboticsRunningWalkingAssistive devicesAugmentationEconomyEnergeticMetabolic costRunWalkWearable robotics

Identifiers

PMID32075669
PMCPMC7029455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.