Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32075666›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2020

20-kHz alternating current stimulation: effects on motor and somatosensory thresholds.

Diego Serrano-Muñoz, Juan Avendaño-Coy, Cristina Simón-Martínez, Julian Taylor, Julio Gómez-Soriano

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02837458 nacompletednot on this map

Application of High Frequency Electrical Currents: Effects on Mechanical Threshold, Tactile Threshold and Evoked Potentials in Healthy Subjects.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaRan2017 to 2017Enrolled14ConditionsHigh Frequency CurrentArmsHigh-Frequency, Sham Stimulation
NCT05230836 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness and Safety of Electrical Stimulation With Alternating High-frequency Currents (30-50 Kilohertz) on the Sensorimotor System in Healthy Volunteer Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaRan2022 to 2022Enrolled34ConditionsHealthy, Nerve Block, PainArmsHigh-frequency alternating current stimulation, Sham current stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Diego Serrano-MuñozSensorimotor Function Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
Juan Avendaño-CoyToledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursery, Castilla La Mancha University, 45071, Toledo, Spain. juan.avendano@uclm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-8760-3490
Cristina Simón-MartínezDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Julian TaylorSensorimotor Function Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
Julio Gómez-SorianoToledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursery, Castilla La Mancha University, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ESKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh frequency alternating current (HFAC) stimulation have been shown to produce a peripheral nerve conduction block. Currently, all the studies applying HFAC stimulation in clinical studies, have employed frequencies below 10 kHz. The main aim of this work was to investigate the neuromodulatory effect of transcutaneous 20 kHz stimulation on somatosensory and pain thresholds, and maximal handgrip strength.

methodsA randomized, crossover, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted following recruitment of fourteen healthy volunteers. Transcutaneous stimulation at 20 kHz and sham stimulation were applied over the ulnar and median nerves of fourteen healthy volunteers for 20 min. Maximal handgrip strength (MHS), mechanical detection threshold (MDT) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were registered prior to, during (15 min), immediately after the end (20 min), and 10 min following stimulation.

resultsThe 20 kHz stimulation showed a lower MHS during the stimulation at the 15 min (30.1 kgs SE 2.8) and at 20 min (31.8 kgs, SE 2.8) when compared to sham stimulation (35.1 kgs, SE 3.4; p < 0.001 and 34.2 kgs, SE 3.4; p = 0.03, respectively). The 20 kHz stimulation resulted in a slight increase in MDT at 15 min (0.25 mN; 0.25-2.00) when compared to the sham stimulation (0.25 mN; 0.25-0.25; p = 0.02), and no effects were showed for PPT.

conclusionsHigh-frequency stimulation at 20 kHz suggests a partial block of nerve activity. Studies in subjects with neurological disorders characterized by nerve hyperactivity are needed to confirm the clinical impact of this non-invasive electrical stimulation technique.

trial registrationNCT, NCT02837458. Registered on 12 April 2017.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHand StrengthHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePain ManagementPeripheral NervesSensory ThresholdsTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationYoung AdultHigh-frequencyNerve blockPeripheral nerveTranscutaneous electric stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32075666
PMCPMC7031925
OpenAlexW3012677208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.