ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2020
A computational model to design neural interfaces for lower-limb sensory neuroprostheses.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of flexion contracture severity on early outcomes of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- The optimization of neuroprosthetic interfaces relying on biophysical and surrogate digital twins.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- A Psychophysical Dataset for Vibrotactile Augmented Perception.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Decoding phantom limb movements from intraneural recordings.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Investigating the Feasibility and Safety of Osseointegration With Neural Interfaces for Advanced Prosthetic Control.Cureus · 2025Review
- User-Centered Design of Neuroprosthetics: Advancements and Limitations.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Characterization of Machine Learning-Based Surrogate Models of Neural Activation Under Electrical Stimulation.Bioelectromagnetics · 2025Article
- Sensory integration for neuroprostheses: from functional benefits to neural correlates.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Review
- Towards enhanced functionality of vagus neuroprostheses through in silico optimized stimulation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Biomimetic computer-to-brain communication enhancing naturalistic touch sensations via peripheral nerve stimulation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Neuromorphic hardware for somatosensory neuroprostheses.Nature communications · 2024Review
- Advanced neuroprosthetic electrode design optimized by electromagnetic finite element simulation: innovations and applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Design of an adaptable intrafascicular electrode (AIR) for selective nerve stimulation by model-based optimization.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Autonomous optimization of neuroprosthetic stimulation parameters that drive the motor cortex and spinal cord outputs in rats and monkeys.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Article
- Symbiotic electroneural and musculoskeletal framework to encode proprioception via neurostimulation: ProprioStim.iScience · 2023Article
- Modeling foot sole cutaneous afferents: FootSim.iScience · 2023Article
- Improving postural stability among people with lower-limb amputations by tactile sensory substitution.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Reduction of Phantom Limb Pain and Improved Proprioception through a TSR-Based Surgical Technique: A Case Series of Four Patients with Lower Limb Amputation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- ASCENT (Automated Simulations to Characterize Electrical Nerve Thresholds): A pipeline for sample-specific computational modeling of electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeg amputees suffer the lack of sensory feedback from a prosthesis, which is connected to their low confidence during walking, falls and low mobility. Electrical peripheral nerve stimulation (ePNS) of upper-limb amputee's residual nerves has shown the ability to restore the sensations from the missing limb via intraneural (TIME) and epineural (FINE) neural interfaces. Physiologically plausible stimulation protocols targeting lower limb sciatic nerve hold promise to induce sensory feedback restoration that should facilitate close-to-natural sensorimotor integration and therefore walking corrections. The sciatic nerve, innervating the foot and lower leg, has very different dimensions in respect to upper-limb nerves. Therefore, there is a need to develop a computational model of its behavior in response to the ePNS.
methodsWe employed a hybrid FEM-NEURON model framework for the development of anatomically correct sciatic nerve model. Based on histological images of two distinct sciatic nerve cross-sections, we reconstructed accurate FEM models for testing neural interfaces. Two different electrode types (based on TIME and FINE) with multiple active sites configurations were tested and evaluated for efficiency (selective recruitment of fascicles). We also investigated different policies of stimulation (monopolar and bipolar), as well as the optimal number of implants. Additionally, we optimized the existing simulation framework significantly reducing the computational load.
resultsThe main findings achieved through our modelling study include electrode manufacturing and surgical placement indications, together with beneficial stimulation policy of use. It results that TIME electrodes with 20 active sites are optimal for lower limb and the same number has been obtained for FINE electrodes. To interface the huge sciatic nerve, model indicates that 3 TIMEs is the optimal number of surgically implanted electrodes. Through the bipolar policy of stimulation, all studied configurations were gaining in the efficiency. Also, an indication for the optimized computation is given, which decreased the computation time by 80%.
conclusionsThis computational model suggests the optimal interfaces to use in human subjects with lower limb amputation, their surgical placement and beneficial bipolar policy of stimulation. It will potentially enable the clinical translation of the sensory neuroprosthetics towards the lower limb applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.