Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32075643›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

The secondary KIT mutation p.Ala510Val in a cutaneous mast cell tumour carrying the activating mutation p.Asn508Ile confers resistance to masitinib in dogs.

Fabio Gentilini, Maria Elena Turba, Claire Dally, Masamine Takanosu, Sena Kurita, Makoto Bonkobara

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabio GentiliniDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, BO, Italy. fabio.gentilini@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0970-4827
Maria Elena TurbaGenefast srl, Via Jolanda Baldassari 6, 47122, Forlì, Italy.
Claire DallyLaboratoire d'Anatomie Pathologique Vétérinaire du Sud-Ouest, 129, Route de Blagnac, 31201, Toulouse cedex 2, France.
Masamine TakanosuNasunogahara Animal Clinic 2-3574-98, Asaka, Ohtawara, Tochigi, 324-0043, Japan.
Sena KuritaDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Pathology, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo, 180-8602, Japan.
Makoto BonkobaraDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Pathology, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo, 180-8602, Japan.
Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University · JPLaboratoire d'Aérologie · FRNasunokeHara Animal Clinic · JPUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

Università di Bologna RFO Unibo
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGain-of-function mutations in KIT are driver events of oncogenesis in mast cell tumours (MCTs) affecting companion animals. Somatic mutations of KIT determine the constitutive activation of the tyrosine kinase receptor leading to a worse prognosis and a shorter survival time than MCTs harbouring wild-type KIT. However, canine MCTs carrying KIT somatic mutations generally respond well to tyrosine kinase inhibitors; hence their presence represents a predictor of treatment effectiveness, and its detection allows implementing a stratified medical approach. Despite this, veterinary oncologists experience treatment failures, even with targeted therapies whose cause cannot be elucidated. The first case of an MCT-affected dog caused by a secondary mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain responsible for resistance has recently been reported. The knowledge of this and all the other mutations responsible for resistance would allow the effective bedside implementation of a deeply stratified and more effective medical approach. CASE PRESENTATION: The second case of a canine MCT carrying a different resistance mutation is herein described. The case was characterised by aggressive behaviour and early metastasis unresponsive to both vinblastine- and masitinib-based treatments. Molecular profiling of the tumoural masses revealed two different mutations; other than the already known activating mutation p.Asn508Ile in KIT exon 9, which is tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitive, a nearly adjacent secondary missense mutation, p.Ala510Val, which had never before been described, was detected. In vitro transfection experiments showed that the secondary mutation did not cause the constitutive activation by itself but played a role in conferring resistance to masitinib.

conclusionsThis study highlighted the importance of the accurate molecular profiling of an MCT in order to improve understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying tumourigenesis and reveal chemoresistance in MCTs for more effective therapies. The detection of the somatic mutations responsible for resistance should be included in the molecular screening of MCTs, and a systematic analysis of all the cases characterised by unexpected refractoriness to therapies should be investigated in depth at both the genetic and the phenotypic level.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesDog DiseasesDogsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGain of Function MutationHEK293 CellsHumansMastocytosis, CutaneousPiperidinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitPyridinesSkin NeoplasmsThiazolesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesmasitinibPiperidinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitPyridinesThiazolesVinblastineDogsKITMast cell tumoursResistanceSomatic mutation

Identifiers

PMID32075643
PMCPMC7029481
OpenAlexW3007524815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.