Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32075561›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Crossroads between transposons and gene regulation.

Miguel R Branco, Edward B Chuong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The resolution of evolutionary conflicts within species.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Retrotransposon renaissance in early embryos.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miguel R BrancoBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, QMUL, London E1 2AT, UK.
Edward B ChuongBioFrontiers Institute, Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposons are mobile genetic elements that have made a large contribution to genome evolution in a largely species-specific manner. A wide variety of different transposons have invaded genomes throughout evolution, acting in a first instance as 'selfish' elements, whose success was determined by their ability to self-replicate and expand within the host genome. However, their coevolution with the host has created many crossroads between transposons and the regulation of host gene expression. Transposons are an abundant source of transcriptional modulatory elements, such as gene promoters and enhancers, splicing and termination sites, and regulatory non-coding RNAs. Moreover, transposons have driven the evolution of host defence mechanisms that have been repurposed for gene regulation. However, dissecting the potential functional roles of transposons remains challenging owing to their evolutionary path, as well as their repetitive nature, which requires the development of specialized analytical tools. In this special issue, we present a collection of articles that lay out current paradigms in the field and discuss a vision for future research. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Crossroads between transposons and gene regulation'.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGene Expression RegulationDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID32075561
PMCPMC7061990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.