Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32075363›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology2020

Patterns of Hydroxyurea Prescription and Use in Routine Clinical Management of Polycythemia Vera: A Multicenter Chart Review Study

Yahya Büyükaşık, Rıdvan Ali, Mehmet Turgut, Güray Saydam, Akif Selim Yavuz, Ali Ünal, Muhlis Cem Ar, Orhan Ayyıldız, Fevzi Altuntaş, Müfide Okay and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Yahya BüyükaşıkHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4764-2348
Rıdvan AliUludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-6486-3399
Mehmet TurgutOndokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Samsun, Turkey
Güray SaydamEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İzmir, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-8646-1673
Akif Selim Yavuzİstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-5740-6381
Ali ÜnalErciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Kayseri, Turkey
Muhlis Cem Arİstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-0332-9253
Orhan AyyıldızDicle University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Diyarbakır, Turkey
Fevzi AltuntaşYıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Ankara, Turkey
Müfide OkayHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5317-0597
Rafiye ÇiftçilerHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5687-8531
Özgür MeletliOndokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Samsun, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0178-6036
Nur SoyerEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İzmir, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7722-506X
Metban Mastanzadeİstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-2281-5978
Zeynep GüvenErciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Kayseri, Turkey
Teoman Soysalİstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7417-2118
Abdullah KarakuşDicle University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Diyarbakır, Turkey
Tuğçe Nur YiğenoğluDr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Division of Hematology, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-9962-8882
Barış UçarNovartis Oncology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5210-0589
Ece GökçenNovartis Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey
Tülin TuğlularMarmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, Turkey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate real-life data on patterns of hydroxyurea prescription/use in polycythemia vera (PV). Materials and Methods: This retrospective chart review study included PV patients who had received hydroxyurea therapy for at least 2 months after PV diagnosis. Data were collected from 10 representative academic medical centers. Results: Of 657 patients, 50.9% were in the high-risk group (age ≥60 years and/or history of thromboembolic event). The median duration of hydroxyurea therapy was 43.40 months for all patients; 70.2% of the patients had ongoing hydroxyurea therapy at last follow-up. Hydroxyurea was discontinued in 22.4% of the patients; the most common reason was death (38.5%). The predicted time until hydroxyurea discontinuation was 187.8 months (standard error: ±21.7) for all patients. This duration was shorter in females (140.3±37.7 vs. 187.8±29.7) (p=0.08). This trend was also observed in surviving patients aged ≥50 years at hydroxyurea initiation (122.2±12.4 vs. 187.8±30.7, p=0.03). Among the patients who were still on hydroxyurea therapy, 40.3% had a hematocrit concentration of ≥45% at their last follow-up visit, and the rate of patients with at least one elevated blood cell count was 67.8%. Conclusion: Hydroxyurea prescription patterns and treatment aims are frequently not in accordance with the guideline recommendations. Its discontinuation rate is higher in females.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansHydroxyureaMaleMiddle AgedPolycythemia VeraRetrospective StudiesTurkeyAntineoplastic AgentsHydroxyureaHydroxyureaPolycythemia veraTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID32075363
PMCPMC7463219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.