Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32075316›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2020

The Biological Potential Hidden in Inclusion Bodies.

Laia Gifre-Renom, Joaquin Seras-Franzoso, Diana Rafael, Fernanda Andrade, Olivia Cano-Garrido, Francesc Martinez-Trucharte, Estefania Ugarte-Berzal, Erik Martens, Lise Boon, Antonio Villaverde and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The future of recombinant host defense peptides.Microbial cell factories · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Laia Gifre-RenomDepartment of Ruminant Production, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), 08140 Caldes de Montbui, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2115-2033
Joaquin Seras-FranzosoDrug Delivery & Targeting, CIBBIM-Nanomedicine, Vall d'Hebron Institut of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7893-4773
Diana RafaelDrug Delivery & Targeting, CIBBIM-Nanomedicine, Vall d'Hebron Institut of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Fernanda AndradeDrug Delivery & Targeting, CIBBIM-Nanomedicine, Vall d'Hebron Institut of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4947-2346
Olivia Cano-GarridoNetworking Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Francesc Martinez-TrucharteDrug Delivery & Targeting, CIBBIM-Nanomedicine, Vall d'Hebron Institut of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Estefania Ugarte-BerzalLaboratory of Immunobiology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Erik MartensLaboratory of Immunobiology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7947-6567
Lise BoonLaboratory of Immunobiology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Antonio VillaverdeNetworking Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Ghislain OpdenakkerLaboratory of Immunobiology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Simó SchwartzDrug Delivery & Targeting, CIBBIM-Nanomedicine, Vall d'Hebron Institut of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8297-7971
Anna ArísDepartment of Ruminant Production, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), 08140 Caldes de Montbui, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7830-888X
Elena Garcia-FruitósDepartment of Ruminant Production, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), 08140 Caldes de Montbui, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7498-4864
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESRega Institute for Medical Research · BEInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ES

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2017SGR-229CERCA Programme (Generalitat de Catalunya) -European Social Fund -Fundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer postdoctoral fellowship (J.S.F.)Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats ICREA Academia (A.V.)Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria postdoctoral fellowship FPI-INIA (E.G.F.)Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria predoctoral fellowship FPI-INIA (L.G.R.)Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria RTA2012-00028-C02 and RTA2015-00064-C02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inclusion bodies (IBs) are protein nanoclusters obtained during recombinant protein production processes, and several studies have demonstrated their potential as biomaterials for therapeutic protein delivery. Nevertheless, IBs have been, so far, exclusively sifted by their biological activity in vitro to be considered in further protein-based treatments in vivo. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) protein, which has an important role facilitating the migration of immune cells, was used as model protein. The MMP-9 IBs were compared with their soluble counterpart and with MMP-9 encapsulated in polymeric-based micelles (PM) through ionic and covalent binding. The soluble MMP-9 and the MMP-9-ionic PM showed the highest activity values in vitro. IBs showed the lowest activity values in vitro, but the specific activity evolution in 50% bovine serum at room temperature proved that they were the most stable format. The data obtained with the use of an air-pouch mouse model showed that MMP-9 IBs presented the highest in vivo activity compared to the soluble MMP-9, which was associated only to a low and a transitory peak of activity. These results demonstrated that the in vivo performance is the addition of many parameters that did not always correlate with the in vitro behavior of the protein of interest, becoming especially relevant at evaluating the potential of IBs as a protein-based nanomaterial for therapeutic purposes.

Indexed as

inclusion bodyin vitroin vivomatrix metalloproteinase-9polymeric micellestability

Identifiers

PMID32075316
PMCPMC7076398
OpenAlexW3005904983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.