Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32075250›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2020

Can the High Sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Be Harnessed to Save Cartridge Costs? Results from a Pooled Sputum Evaluation in Cambodia.

Monyrath Chry, Marina Smelyanskaya, Mom Ky, Andrew J Codlin, Danielle Cazabon, Mao Tan Eang, Jacob Creswell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pooling Sputum Samples for Efficient Mass Tuberculosis Screening in Prisons.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Determining the value of TB active case-finding: current evidence and methodological considerations.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Monyrath ChryCambodia Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Phnom Penh and Cambodia, Phnom Penh 12250, Cambodia.
Marina SmelyanskayaStop TB Partnership, TB REACH, 1218 Geneva, Switzerland.
Mom KyCambodia Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Phnom Penh and Cambodia, Phnom Penh 12250, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0003-2951-3750
Andrew J CodlinStop TB Partnership, TB REACH, 1218 Geneva, Switzerland.
Danielle CazabonMcGill International TB Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Mao Tan EangNational Center for Tuberculosis and Leprosy Control (CENAT), Phnom Penh 12250, Cambodia.
Jacob CreswellStop TB Partnership, TB REACH, 1218 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4885-940X
Cambodia National Malaria Center · KHMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

Global Affairs Canada 7062544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the World Health Organization recommending the use of rapid molecular tests for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB), uptake has been limited, partially due to high cartridge costs. Other infectious disease programs pool specimens to save on diagnostic test costs. We tested a sputum pooling strategy as part of a TB case finding program using Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra). All persons were tested with Ultra individually, and their remaining specimens were also grouped with 3-4 samples for testing in a pooled sample. Individual and pooled testing results were compared to see if people with TB would have been missed when using pooling. We assessed the potential cost and time savings which different pooling strategies could achieve. We tested 584 individual samples and also grouped them in 153 pools for testing separately. Individual testing identified 91 (15.6%) people with positive Ultra results. One hundred percent of individual positive results were also found to be positive by the pooling strategy. Pooling would have saved 27% of cartridge and processing time. Our results are the first to use Ultra in a pooled approach for TB, and demonstrate feasibility in field conditions. Pooling did not miss any TB cases and can save time and money. The impact of pooling is only realized when yield is low.

Indexed as

case detectionlaboratory methodsTB diagnosticsXpert Ultra

Identifiers

PMID32075250
PMCPMC7157618
OpenAlexW3006420266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.