Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32075173›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Geographical Disparities in Screening and Cancer-Related Health Behaviour.

Belinda C Goodwin, Arlen K Rowe, Fiona Crawford-Williams, Peter Baade, Suzanne K Chambers, Nicholas Ralph, Joanne F Aitken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Geographical Disparities in Faecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation and Positivity Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Belinda C GoodwinCancer Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3425-4848
Arlen K RoweInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield QLD 4300, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1880-8513
Fiona Crawford-WilliamsInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield QLD 4300, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9900-0611
Peter BaadeCancer Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8576-8868
Suzanne K ChambersInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield QLD 4300, Australia.
Nicholas RalphCancer Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, Australia.
Joanne F AitkenCancer Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, Australia.
University of Southern Queensland · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUGriffith University · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify whether cancer-related health behaviours including participation in cancer screening vary by geographic location in Australia. Data were obtained from the 2014-2015 Australian National Health Survey, a computer-assisted telephone interview that measured a range of health-related issues in a sample of randomly selected households. Chi-square tests and adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression models were computed to assess the association between residential location and cancer-related health behaviours including cancer screening participation, alcohol consumption, smoking, exercise, and fruit and vegetable intake, controlling for age, socio-economic status (SES), education, and place of birth. The findings show insufficient exercise, risky alcohol intake, meeting vegetable intake guidelines, and participation in cervical screening are more likely for those living in inner regional areas and in outer regional/remote areas compared with those living in major cities. Daily smoking and participation in prostate cancer screening were significantly higher for those living in outer regional/remote areas. While participation in cancer screening in Australia does not appear to be negatively impacted by regional or remote living, lifestyle behaviours associated with cancer incidence and mortality are poorer in regional and remote areas. Population-based interventions targeting health behaviour change may be an appropriate target for reducing geographical disparities in cancer outcomes.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth BehaviorAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsProstate-Specific Antigenalcoholcancercancer screeningdiet exercisegeographical disparityhealth behaviorpublic healthregionalremotesmoking

Identifiers

PMID32075173
PMCPMC7068477
OpenAlexW3006017485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.