ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Tit for Tat: Abusive Supervision and Knowledge Hiding-The Role of Psychological Contract Breach and Psychological Ownership.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Knowledge Hiding: Current Research Status and Future Research Directions.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Pooled it
- The impact of abusive supervision by coaches on athlete burnout in Chinese culture.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- How Does Servant Leadership Nurture Nurses' Job Embeddedness? Uncovering Sequential Mediation of Psychological Contract Fulfillment and Psychological Ownership.Journal of nursing management · 2023Article
- Expanding the dimensions of knowledge hiding: testing a moderated mediation model and analyzing the mediating role of psychological distress using PLS-SEM.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Effect of abusive supervision on organizational cynicism (Cognitive, affective, behavioral) mediating effect of playing dumb.PloS one · 2023Article
- Workplace suspicion, knowledge hiding, and silence behavior: A double-moderated mediation model of knowledge-based psychological ownership and face consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The Mediating Role of Organisational Identification between Psychological Contract and Work Results: An Individual Level Investigation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Does Technostress Increase R&D Employees' Knowledge Hiding in the Digital Era?Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Impact of Organizational Dehumanization on Employee Knowledge Hiding.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Influence of Network Location on Knowledge Hiding from the Perspective of Lifelong Education.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
- Do overqualified employees hide knowledge? The mediating role of psychological contract breach.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Exploring the underlying mechanism between fear of losing power and knowledge hiding.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Does Participative Leadership Matters in Employees' Outcomes During COVID-19? Role of Leader Behavioral Integrity.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Impact of Knowledge Hiding Behaviors on Workplace Invincibility: Mediating Role of Psychological Contract Breach.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Abusive Supervision and Its Impact on Knowledge Hiding Behavior Among Sales Force.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- How Authoritarian Leadership Affects Employee's Helping Behavior? The Mediating Role of Rumination and Moderating Role of Psychological Ownership.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- When Is the Negative Effect of Abusive Supervision on Task Performance Mitigated? An Empirical Study of Public Service Officers in Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extant literature has focused on individuals' knowledge-sharing behavior and its driving factors, which stimulate the knowledge transmission and exchange in organizations. However, little research has focused on factors that inhibit knowledge sharing and encourage individuals to hide their knowledge. Therefore, based on social exchange and displaced aggression theories, the study proposed and checked a model that examined the effect of abusive supervision on knowledge hiding (KH) via a psychological contract breach (PCB). The Psychological ownership was regarded as a boundary condition on abusive supervision and KH relationship. Using a time-lagged method, we recruited 344 full-time employees enrolled in an executive development program in a large university in China. The findings show that PCB mediates the association between abusive supervision and KH. Similarly, psychological ownership moderates the association between abusive supervision and KH. Employees with high psychological ownership minimized the effect of abusive supervision on KH. Based on study findings, contributions to theory and practice, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.