Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32074948›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Novel Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft Model for Preclinical Studies.

Masanori Oshi, Maiko Okano, Aparna Maiti, Omar M Rashid, Katsuharu Saito, Koji Kono, Ryusei Matsuyama, Itaru Endo, Kazuaki Takabe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient-Derived Xenograft Models in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The In Vivo Selection Method in Breast Cancer Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Conflicting roles ofAmerican journal of cancer research · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Masanori OshiBreast Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1404-1570
Maiko OkanoBreast Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1118-8494
Aparna MaitiBreast Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Omar M RashidDepartment of Surgery, Holy Cross Hospital, Michael and Dianne Bienes Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2898-2459
Katsuharu SaitoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Koji KonoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Ryusei MatsuyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.
Itaru EndoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.
Kazuaki TakabeBreast Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6435-4241
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USFukushima Medical University · JPYokohama City University · JPHoly Cross Hospital · US

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Dean G. Tang · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
Sphingosine-1 Phosphate in Breast Cancer Progression and LymphangiogenesisR01CA160688 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI TAKABE, KAZUAKI · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30CA16056NCI NIH HHS R01CA160688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast majority of mortality in breast cancer results from distant metastasis. Brain metastases occur in as many as 30% of patients with advanced breast cancer, and the 1-year survival rate of these patients is around 20%. Pre-clinical animal models that reliably reflect the biology of breast cancer brain metastasis are needed to develop and test new treatments for this deadly condition. The patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model maintains many features of a donor tumor, such as intra-tumor heterogeneity, and permits the testing of individualized treatments. However, the establishment of orthotopic PDXs of brain metastasis is procedurally difficult. We have developed a method for generating such PDXs with high tumor engraftment and growth rates. Here, we describe this method and identify variables that affect its outcomes. We also compare the brain-orthotopic PDXs with ectopic PDXs grown in mammary pads of mice, and show that the responsiveness of PDXs to chemotherapeutic reagents can be dramatically affected by the site that they are in.

Indexed as

brain metastasisbreast cancerepothilonegene expressionmouse modelorthotopic implantationPDXpre-clinical modelxenograft

Identifiers

PMID32074948
PMCPMC7072242
OpenAlexW3006589200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.