Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32074511›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2020

An easy-to-assemble, robust, and lightweight drive implant for chronic tetrode recordings in freely moving animals.

Jakob Voigts, Jonathan P Newman, Matthew A Wilson, Mark T Harnett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakob VoigtsDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5174-7214
Jonathan P NewmanDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5425-3340
Matthew A WilsonDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Mark T HarnettDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.

Funding

Sleep-dependent Memory Processing in SchizophreniaR01MH092638 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DARA S MANOACH · 2012 to 2026
$7.4M
Redesigning General Anesthesia (Admin Supp)R01GM104948 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BOYDEN, EDWARD S., BROWN, EMERY N · 2012 to 2016
$4.4M
Dendritic Computation and Representation of Head Direction in Retrosplenial CortexR01NS113079 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HARNETT, MARK THOMAS · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
A dendritic mechanism for cholinergic neuromodulation of cortical functionR01NS106031 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HARNETT, MARK THOMAS · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Integrated compressive sensing microscope for high-speed functional biological imagingR21EY028381 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CHIN, SANG PETER · 2017 to 2018
$490k
Supplement: Robotic Platform for High-Densisty in Vivo Intracellular recordingR21NS103098 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HARNETT, MARK THOMAS, KODANDARAMAIAH, SUHASA B · 2017 to 2018
$483k
Revealing the causal role of hippocampal dopamine signaling in spatial learningF32MH107086 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI NEWMAN, JONATHAN · 2015 to 2017
$168k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY028381NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104948NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH107086NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092638NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106031NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113079NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS103098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tetrode arrays are a standard method for neuronal recordings in behaving animals, especially for chronic recordings of many neurons in freely-moving animals.

objectiveWe sought to simplify tetrode drive designs with the aim of enabling building and implanting a 16-tetrode drive in a single day. APPROACH: Our design makes use of recently developed technologies to reduce the complexity of the drive while maintaining a low weight. MAIN

resultsThe design presents an improvement over existing implants in terms of robustness, weight, and ease of use. We describe two variants: a 16 tetrode implant weighing ∼2 g for mice, bats, tree shrews and similar animals, and a 64 tetrode implant weighing ∼16 g for rats and similar animals. These designs were co-developed and optimized alongside a new class of drive-mounted feature-rich amplifier boards with ultra-thin radio-frequency tethers, as described in an upcoming paper (Newman, Zhang et al in prep). SIGNIFICANCE: This design significantly improves the data yield of chronic electrophysiology experiments.

Indexed as

NeuronsProstheses and ImplantsAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaMiceRats

Identifiers

PMID32074511
PMCPMC8878001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.