Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32074108›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis during pregnancy: An 8-year case-control study.

Chloé Arthuis, Caroline Diguisto, Henri Lorphelin, Vincent Dochez, Emmanuel Simon, Franck Perrotin, Norbert Winer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Obstetric cholestasis and its impact on the maternal outcome.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chloé ArthuisDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Regional Center Tours, Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7937-3648
Caroline DiguistoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Regional Center Tours, Tours, France.
Henri LorphelinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Regional Center Tours, Tours, France.
Vincent DochezDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Center Nantes, Nantes, France.
Emmanuel SimonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Regional Center Tours, Tours, France.
Franck PerrotinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Regional Center Tours, Tours, France.
Norbert WinerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Center Nantes, Nantes, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious studies of fetal effects have suggested that intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with a higher rate of adverse neonatal outcomes including preterm birth, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and stillbirth. The objective was to compare the neonatal and maternal consequences in pregnancies affected by intrahepatic cholestasis and normal pregnancies. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis case-control study compares pregnancies affected by intrahepatic cholestasis (pruritus and bile acid ≥ 10 μmol/L) with low-risk pregnancies managed between December 2006 and December 2014 at a French university hospital center.

resultsThere were 83 (59.3%) cases of mild cholestasis (10≤ BA ≤39 μmol/L), 46 (32.8%) of moderate cholestasis (40≤ BA ≤99 μmol/L), and 11 (7.9%) of severe cholestasis (BA ≥100 μmol/L). No in utero fetal deaths occurred in the 140 women with cholestasis or the 560 controls analyzed. The rate of respiratory distress syndrome was higher in neonates of women with intrahepatic cholestasis (17.1% vs. 4.6%, P<0.001; crude OR 4.46 (CI95% 2.49-8.03)). This risk was also significant after adjustment for gestational age at birth and mode of delivery, adjusted OR 2.56 (CI95%1.26-5.18). The postpartum hemorrhage rate was twice as high among the case mothers (25% versus 14.1% for controls, P = 0.002).

conclusionAfter adjustment on the confounding factors we found a higher rate of respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal morbidity among neonates of the cholestasis group.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAdultBile Acids and SaltsCase-Control StudiesCholestasis, IntrahepaticFemaleGestational AgeHemorrhageHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalOdds RatioPerinatal MortalityPostpartum PeriodPregnancyBile Acids and Salts

Identifiers

PMID32074108
PMCPMC7029845
OpenAlexW3007213074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.