Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32073806›Full record

ArticleJournal of health organization and management2020

Simulation educators in clinical work: the manager's perspective.

Éva Tamás, Marie-Louise Södersved Källestedt, Håkan Hult, Liisa Carlzon, Klas Karlgren, Magnus Berndtzon, Magnus Hultin, Italo Masiello, Renée Allvin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health organization and management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. When caring becomes an art - how clinical gaze are perceived to be developed.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Éva TamásInstitution for Medicine and Health, Linkopings Universitet, Linkoping, Sweden.
Marie-Louise Södersved KällestedtClinical Skills Centre, Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Håkan HultDepartment of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Liisa CarlzonSimulation Centre West, Department of Research, Education and Development, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.
Klas KarlgrenThe Södersjukhuset Hospital and Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Magnus BerndtzonMetodikum - Skill Centre of Medical Simulation, Region County Jönköping, Jönköping, Sweden.
Magnus HultinDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (Sunderbyn), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Italo MasielloDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Renée AllvinClinical Skills Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SELinköping University · SEÖrebro University · SERegion Jönköpings län · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUmeå University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInformation is scarce on healthcare managers' understanding of simulation educators' impact on clinical work. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore healthcare managers' perceptions of the significance of clinically active simulation educators for the organisation. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Healthcare managers were invited to be interviewed in a semi-structured manner. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify and analyse patterns of notions describing the managers' perceptions of simulation educators' impact as co-workers on their healthcare organisations.

findingsThe identified relevant themes for the healthcare unit were: (1) value for the manager, (2) value for the community and (3) boundaries. Simulation educators were perceived to be valuable gatekeepers of evidence-based knowledge and partners in leadership for educational issues. Their most prominent value for the community was establishing a reflective climate, facilitating open communication and thereby improving the efficacy of teamwork. Local tradition, economy, logistics and staffing of the unit during simulation training were suggested to have possible negative impacts on simulation educators' work. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The findings might have implications for the implementation and support of simulation training programs. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare managers appreciated both the personal value of simulation educators and the effect of their work for their own unit. Local values were prioritised versus global. Simulation training was valued as an educational tool for continual professional development, although during the interviews, the managers did not indicate the importance of employment of pedagogically competent and experienced staff. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The study provided new insights about how simulation educators as team members affect clinical practice.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareProfessional RoleSimulation TrainingCooperative BehaviorEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleHospital AdministratorsHumansInterviews as TopicLeadershipMalePatient SafetyQualitative ResearchCommunity of practiceContinuing medical educationOrganisational learningPatient safetyPatient simulationTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID32073806
PMCPMC7410304
OpenAlexW3007917137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.