ArticleCancer medicine2020
Distinctive lung cancer incidence trends among men and women attributable to the period effect in Shanghai: An analysis spanning 42 years.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Nano-oncology revisited: Insights on precise therapeutic advances and challenges in tumor.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Natural Compounds for Preventing Age-Related Diseases and Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Secular-Trend Analysis of the Incidence Rate of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Gender disparities in incidence and projections of lung cancer in China and the United States from 1978 to 2032: an age-period-cohort analysis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Article
- Secular Trends of Mortality and Years of Life Lost Due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Wuhan, China from 2010 to 2019: Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Temporal trends in lung cancer mortality and years of life lost in Wuhan, China, 2010-2019.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in Anhui, China: A randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Time trends of major cancers incidence and mortality in Guangzhou, China 2004-2015: A Joinpoint and Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Association between sex hormones regulation-related SNP rs12233719 and lung cancer risk among never-smoking Chinese women.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Transcriptome Based Estrogen Related Genes Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Distinctive lung cancer incidence trends among men and women attributable to the period effect in Shanghai: An analysis spanning 42 years.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany previous studies reported secular trend of lung cancer incidence and mortality, but little is known about the possible reasons for these trends.
methodsData were obtained from Shanghai Cancer Registry. Age-standardized rates were calculated and average annual percent changes (AAPCs) were evaluated by Joinpoint regression. Age, period, and birth cohort effects were assessed by age-period-cohort models.
resultsFrom 1973 to 2010, compared with long-time slowly increasing trend in women, male lung cancer incidence had significantly decreased between 2001 and 2009. After that lung cancer incidence rising sharply in women (AAPC = 14.13%, 95%CI: 2.68%-26.86%, P = .016) and similar rising trends without statistical significance in men (AAPC = 2.96, 95%CI: -2.47%-8.69%, P = .281) between 2010 and 2014. Age-period cohort model showed the different patterns of period effects for lung cancer incidence between men and women. The period effects for lung cancer incidence showed rising effect for women, whereas there was decline effect for lung cancer incidence for men. On the other hand, the model showed a significant period effect in both genders with a similar fashion in mortality, yielding steady falling trends during the entire study period.
conclusionsThe distinctive patterns of lung cancer incidence between men and women may be attributable to significant period effects, which reflected the changes in public health policies or diagnostic practices and highlighted the urgent of continued monitoring of gender-specific risk factors for lung cancer incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.