Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32073557›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2020

The impact of allergic rhinitis in clinical practice: an Italian Survey.

Desiderio Passali, Luisa Maria Bellussi, Valerio Damiani, Francesco Maria Passali, Gaetano Motta, Giorgio Ciprandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Desiderio PassaliInternational Federation ORL Societies (IFOS). gio.cip@libero.it.
Luisa Maria BellussiInternational Federation ORL Societies (IFOS). gio.cip@libero.it.
Valerio DamianiDMG Medical Department, Pomezia (Rome), Italy. gio.cip@libero.it.
Francesco Maria PassaliENT Department, University Tor Vergata, Rome. gio.cip@libero.it.
Gaetano MottaENT Department, Univerisity Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy. gio.cip@libero.it.
Giorgio CiprandiAllergy Clinic, Casa di Cura Villa Montallegro, Genoa, Italy. gio.cip@libero.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a very common disorder. The current Survey was conducted on a sample of about 5,000 adult subjects in 5 Italian cities. A questionnaire, containing 15 questions, was administered on the road. AR affects about 20% of the general population. The most common diagnostic test was the skin prick test, but only 12% of patients performed an allergy test to confirm the diagnosis. About 50% of patients did not take any medicine. Even about 40% of treatments were suggested by friends or pharmacists. In conclusion, the current Survey demonstrated that AR is a common disorder in Italy, the diagnostic work-up is still incorrect, and the therapeutic approach does not adhere to the guidelines. Therefore, there is a need to implement adequate information on this topic in Italy.

Indexed as

Rhinitis, AllergicAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID32073557
PMCPMC7947741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.