ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2020
Regional Variation in Striatal Dopamine Spillover and Release Plasticity.
Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Striatal Dopamine Contributions to Skilled Motor Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Simultaneous serotonin and dopamine monitoring across timescales by rapid pulse voltammetry with partial least squares regression.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021Article
- Isoliquiritigenin Alleviates Semen Strychni-Induced Neurotoxicity by Restoring the Metabolic Pathway of Neurotransmitters in Rats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Dopamine Receptor Subtypes, Physiology and Pharmacology: New Ligands and Concepts in Schizophrenia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent optical observations of dopamine at axon terminals and kinetic modeling of evoked dopamine responses measured by fast scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) support local restriction of dopamine diffusion at synaptic release sites. Yet, how this diffusion barrier affects synaptic and volume transmission is unknown. Here, a deficiency in a previous kinetic model's fitting of stimulus trains is remedied by replacing an earlier assumption that dopamine transporters (DATs) are present only on the outer side of the diffusion barrier with the assumption that they are present on both sides. This is consistent with the known distribution of DATs, which does not show obvious DAT-free zones proximal to dopamine release sites. A simultaneous multifitting strategy is then shown to enable unique model fits to sets of evoked dopamine FSCV responses acquired
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.