Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32073224›Full record

ArticleBJS open2020

Endothelial dysfunction is an early indicator of sepsis and neutrophil degranulation of septic shock in surgical patients.

M Martin-Fernandez, L M Vaquero-Roncero, R Almansa, E Gómez-Sánchez, S Martín, E Tamayo, M C Esteban-Velasco, P Ruiz-Granado, M Aragón, D Calvo and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Role of Tie-2 Axis in Sepsis: A Potential Therapeutic Target.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Biological attributes of zinc-dependent endopeptidases in endothelial dysfunction associated with sepsis: a narrative review.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

M Martin-FernandezGroup for Biomedical Research in Sepsis (BioSepsis), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
L M Vaquero-RonceroAnaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
R AlmansaGroup for Biomedical Research in Sepsis (BioSepsis), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
E Gómez-SánchezGroup for Biomedical Research in Critical Care (BioCritic), Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
S MartínAnaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
E TamayoGroup for Biomedical Research in Critical Care (BioCritic), Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
M C Esteban-VelascoDepartment of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL) and Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
P Ruiz-GranadoGroup for Biomedical Research in Critical Care (BioCritic), Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
M AragónGroup for Biomedical Research in Critical Care (BioCritic), Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
D CalvoClinical Analysis Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
J Rico-FeijooAnaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
A OrtegaGroup for Biomedical Research in Sepsis (BioSepsis), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
E Gómez-PesqueraGroup for Biomedical Research in Critical Care (BioCritic), Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
M Lorenzo-LópezGroup for Biomedical Research in Critical Care (BioCritic), Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
J LópezDepartment of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL) and Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4506-4951
C DoncelGroup for Biomedical Research in Sepsis (BioSepsis), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
C González-SanchezDepartment of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL) and Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
D ÁlvarezAnaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
E ZarcaClinical Analysis Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
A Ríos-LlorenteAnaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
A Diaz-AlvarezAnaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
E Sanchez-BarradoAnaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
D Andaluz-OjedaIntensive Care Medicine Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
J M Calvo-VecinoAnaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
L Muñoz-BellvísDepartment of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL) and Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
J I Gomez-HerrerasGroup for Biomedical Research in Critical Care (BioCritic), Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
C Abad-MolinaMicrobiology and Immunology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
J F Bermejo-MartinGroup for Biomedical Research in Sepsis (BioSepsis), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7998-6268
C AldecoaAnaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
M Heredia-RodríguezAnaesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ESHospital Universitario Río Hortega · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

Consejería de Educación de Castilla y León/Fondo social EuropeoEuropean Union (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, Una manera de hacer Europa)Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI15/01451Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI15/01959Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/01156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStratification of the severity of infection is currently based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, which is difficult to calculate outside the ICU. Biomarkers could help to stratify the severity of infection in surgical patients.

methodsLevels of ten biomarkers indicating endothelial dysfunction, 22 indicating emergency granulopoiesis, and six denoting neutrophil degranulation were compared in three groups of patients in the first 12 h after diagnosis at three Spanish hospitals.

resultsThere were 100 patients with infection, 95 with sepsis and 57 with septic shock. Seven biomarkers indicating endothelial dysfunction (mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-ProADM), syndecan 1, thrombomodulin, angiopoietin 2, endothelial cell-specific molecule 1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and E-selectin) had stronger associations with sepsis than infection alone. MR-ProADM had the highest odds ratio (OR) in multivariable analysis (OR 11·53, 95 per cent c.i. 4·15 to 32·08; P = 0·006) and the best area under the curve (AUC) for detecting sepsis (0·86, 95 per cent c.i. 0·80 to 0·91; P < 0·001). In a comparison of sepsis with septic shock, two biomarkers of neutrophil degranulation, proteinase 3 (OR 8·09, 1·34 to 48·91; P = 0·028) and lipocalin 2 (OR 6·62, 2·47 to 17·77; P = 0·002), had the strongest association with septic shock, but lipocalin 2 exhibited the highest AUC (0·81, 0·73 to 0·90; P < 0·001).

conclusionMR-ProADM and lipocalin 2 could be alternatives to the SOFA score in the detection of sepsis and septic shock respectively in surgical patients with infection.

Indexed as

AdrenomedullinAdultAgedAngiopoietin-2Area Under CurveBiomarkersFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLipocalin-2MaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeutrophilsOrgan Dysfunction ScoresAdrenomedullinAngiopoietin-2BiomarkersLipocalin-2proadrenomedullinProtein PrecursorsThrombomodulinVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1

Identifiers

PMID32073224
PMCPMC7260414
OpenAlexW3008819550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.