ReviewThe oncologist2020
Maximizing Breast Cancer Therapy with Awareness of Potential Treatment-Related Blood Disorders.
Review in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risks of second non-breast primaries following breast cancer in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2023Pooled it
- Myeloid neoplasms post cytotoxic therapy (MN-pCT) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a patient withInternational cancer conference journal · 2026Article
- Network Pharmacology Study on the Underlying Mechanism of Danggui-Kushen Herb Pair in Adjuvant Chemotherapeutics against Breast Cancer.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Article
- Uncovering the anti-breast cancer activity potential of east Kalimantan propolis by In vitro and bioinformatics analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- BRCA2 germline mutation in familial leukaemia with familial breast cancer: a case report.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Survival analysis of breast cancer patients after diagnosis of second primary malignancies, focusing on the second primary hematologic malignancy.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2023Article
- Article
- Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia Following TCHP Chemotherapy in Two HER2+ Breast Cancer Patients.Cureus · 2020Article
- A Bioinformatics Research on Novel Mechanism of Compound Kushen Injection for Treating Breast Cancer by Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Verification.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Article
- Noncoding RNAs and Their Response Predictive Value in Azacitidine-treated Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Myelodysplasia-related Changes.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review we summarize the impact of the various modalities of breast cancer therapy coupled with intrinsic patient factors on incidence of subsequent treatment-induced myelodysplasia and acute myelogenous leukemia (t-MDS/AML). It is clear that risk is increased for patients treated with radiation and chemotherapy at younger ages. Radiation is associated with modest risk, whereas chemotherapy, particularly the combination of an alkylating agent and an anthracycline, carries higher risk and radiation and chemotherapy combined increase the risk markedly. Recently, treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), but not pegylated G-CSF, has been identified as a factor associated with increased t-MDS/AML risk. Two newly identified associations may link homologous DNA repair gene deficiency and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor treatment to increased t-MDS/AML risk. When predisposing factors, such as young age, are combined with an increasing number of potentially leukemogenic treatments that may not confer large risk singly, the risk of t-MDS/AML appears to increase. Patient and treatment factors combine to form a biological cascade that can trigger a myelodysplastic event. Patients with breast cancer are often exposed to many of these risk factors in the course of their treatment, and triple-negative patients, who are often younger and/or BRCA positive, are often exposed to all of them. It is important going forward to identify effective therapies without these adverse associated effects and choose existing therapies that minimize the risk of t-MDS/AML without sacrificing therapeutic gain. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Breast cancer is far more curable than in the past but requires multimodality treatment. Great care must be taken to use the least leukemogenic treatment programs that do not sacrifice efficacy. Elimination of radiation and anthracycline/alkylating agent regimens will be helpful where possible, particularly in younger patients and possibly those with homologous repair deficiency (HRD). Use of colony-stimulating factors should be limited to those who truly require them for safe chemotherapy administration. Further study of a possible leukemogenic association with HRD and the various forms of colony-stimulating factors is badly needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.