Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32073117›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2020

The Effect of Pain Catastrophizing on Endogenous Inhibition of Pain and Spinal Nociception in Native Americans: Results From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk.

Tyler A Toledo, Bethany L Kuhn, Michael F Payne, Edward W Lannon, Shreela Palit, Cassandra A Sturycz, Natalie Hellman, Yvette M Güereca, Mara J Demuth, Felicitas Huber and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Catastrophizing and fear avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reward system neurodynamics during menstrual pain modulated byFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tyler A ToledoDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Bethany L KuhnDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Michael F PayneDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Edward W LannonDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Shreela PalitDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Cassandra A SturyczDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Natalie HellmanDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Yvette M GüerecaDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Mara J DemuthDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Felicitas HuberDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Joanna O ShadlowDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Jamie L RhudyDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
University of Tulsa · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

the Integrative and Multidisciplinary Pain and Aging Research Training (IMPART) ProgramT32AG049673 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI FILLINGIM, ROGER B · 2015 to 2024
$3.2M
Native American Pain Disparities: Exploring Nociceptive Processing DifferencesR01MD007807 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TULSA · PI RHUDY, JAMIE LYNN · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG049673NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a task that involves measuring pain in response to a test stimulus before and during a painful conditioning stimulus (CS). The CS pain typically inhibits pain elicited by the test stimulus; thus, this task is used to assess endogenous pain inhibition. Moreover, less efficient CPM-related inhibition is associated with chronic pain risk. Pain catastrophizing is a cognitive-emotional process associated with negative pain sequelae, and some studies have found that catastrophizing reduces CPM efficiency. PURPOSE: The current study examined the relationship between catastrophizing (dispositional and situation specific) and CPM-related inhibition of pain and the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR; a marker of spinal nociception) to determine whether the catastrophizing-CPM relationship might contribute to the higher risk of chronic pain in Native Americans (NAs).

methodsCPM of pain and NFR was assessed in 124 NAs and 129 non-Hispanic Whites. Dispositional catastrophizing was assessed at the beginning of the test day, whereas situation-specific catastrophizing was assessed in response to the CS, as well as painful electric stimuli.

resultsSituation-specific, but not dispositional, catastrophizing led to less NFR inhibition but more pain inhibition. These effects were not moderated by race, but mediation analyses found that: (a) the NA race was associated with greater situation-specific catastrophizing, which led to less NFR inhibition and more pain inhibition, and (b) situation-specific catastrophizing was associated with greater CS pain, which led to more pain inhibition.

conclusionsCatastrophizing may contribute to NA pain risk by disrupting descending inhibition.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeCatastrophizationConditioning, ClassicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural InhibitionNociceptionOklahomaPainPain MeasurementSpinal CordCatastrophizingChronic pain riskCopingPain modulationRacial/ethnic differences

Identifiers

PMID32073117
PMCPMC7414293
OpenAlexW3006750925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.