Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32072617›Full record

Trial reportAnaesthesia2020

Effect of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on kidney and haemostatic function in cardiac surgical patients: a randomised controlled trial.

A E Duncan, Y Jia, E Soltesz, S Leung, H O Yilmaz, G Mao, A A Timur, K Kottke-Marchant, H J Rogers, C Ma and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Comparison of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4World journal of cardiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A E DuncanDepartments of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Y JiaDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
E SolteszDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
S LeungDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
H O YilmazDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
G MaoDepartments of Quantitative Health Sciences and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
A A TimurDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
K Kottke-MarchantDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Administration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
H J RogersDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
C MaDepartments of Quantitative Health Sciences and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
I InceDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
N KarimiDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
S YagarDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
C TrombettaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
D I SesslerDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USOutcomes Research Consortium · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether third-generation hydroxyethyl starch solutions provoke kidney injury or haemostatic abnormalities in patients having cardiac surgery remains unclear. We tested the hypotheses that intra-operative administration of a third-generation starch does not worsen postoperative kidney function or haemostasis in cardiac surgical patients compared with human albumin 5%. This triple-blind, non-inferiority, clinical trial randomly allocated patients aged 40-85 who underwent elective aortic valve replacement, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting, to plasma volume replacement with 6% starch 130/0.4 vs. 5% human albumin. Our primary outcome was postoperative urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations, a sensitive and early marker of postoperative kidney injury. Secondarily, we evaluated urinary interleukin-18; acute kidney injury using creatinine RIFLE criteria, coagulation measures, platelet count and function. Non-inferiority (delta 15%) was assessed with correction for multiple comparisons. We enrolled 141 patients (69 starch, 72 albumin) as planned. Results of the primary analysis demonstrated that postoperative urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (median (IQR [range])) was slightly lower with hydroxyethyl starch (5 (1-68 [0-996]) ng.ml

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood CoagulationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHemostaticsHumansHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesIntraoperative CareKidneyMaleMiddle AgedPlasma SubstitutesHemostaticsHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesPlasma Substitutescardiac surgeryhydroxyethyl starchurinary interleukin-18urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin

Identifiers

PMID32072617
PMCPMC9291605
OpenAlexW3008742087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.