Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32072571›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2021

Rumination, mood, and maladaptive eating behaviors in overweight and healthy populations.

Monika Kornacka, Kamila Czepczor-Bernat, Piotr Napieralski, Anna Brytek-Matera

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Perseverative Cognition and Snack Choice: An Online Pilot Investigation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika KornackaInstitute of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, ul. Chodakowska 18/31, 03-815, Warsaw, Poland. mkornacka@swps.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2737-9236
Kamila Czepczor-BernatInstitute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.
Piotr NapieralskiInstitute of Information Technology, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Poland.
Anna Brytek-MateraInstitute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.
University of Wrocław · PLLodz University of Technology · PLUniversité de Lille · FR

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2016/21/P/HS6/04009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe literature suggests that rumination (i.e., repetitive thinking about 1 or more negative concerns that is perceived as difficult to control) is linked to impaired emotional regulation and increases negative affect. Not only individuals suffering from overweight or obesity, but also healthy individuals might use emotional eating as a coping strategy to deal with negative affect caused by rumination. The aim of the present study was to determine the link between rumination and maladaptive eating strategies in participants with normal weight and overweight/obesity using trait and ecological momentary measures.

methodIn Study 1, 88 individuals from overweight/obese (N = 33) and control group (N = 50) filled in a series of questionnaires assessing trait rumination, and eating behaviors. In Study 2 momentary affect, rumination and eating behavior of 26 participants were assessed using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methodology.

resultsIn Study 1, the moderated mediation model revealed that emotional eating mediates the link between rumination and uncontrolled eating or snacking, but only in healthy participants and not in the participants with overweight. The results of Study 2 suggest that when both momentary rumination and sad mood are entered into the model predicting momentary daily emotional eating, only rumination remains a significant predictor of emotional eating. This relationship is not modified by the fact that the participants are from healthy controls or the overweight/obese group. DISCUSSION: Study 1 provided evidence on the differential role of emotional eating in participants with normal weight and with overweight. Study 2 provided initial insights into the role of momentary mood and momentary repetitive thinking in the use of emotional eating in participants' everyday lives. The differences in group effect in trait and EMA measures indicated also the importance of considering the consciousness of using rumination and emotional eating, while studying those processes in individuals with overweight. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control analytic study.

Indexed as

AffectOverweightEcological Momentary AssessmentFeeding BehaviorHumansObesityEcological momentary assessmentEmotional eatingOverweightRuminationUncontrolled eating

Identifiers

PMID32072571
PMCPMC7895787
OpenAlexW3008084019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.