Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32072426›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Response of ecosystem functioning to environmental variations in an artificial sand-binding vegetation desert in northwestern China.

Yuanyuan Zhou, Xinrong Li, Yanhong Gao, Yanli Wang, Zhongchao Mao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuanyuan ZhouShapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Xinrong LiShapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China. lxinrong@lzb.ac.cn.
Yanhong GaoShapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Yanli WangShapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Zhongchao MaoShapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China 41530746Natural Science Foundation of China 41671210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The establishment of artificial sand-binding vegetation is one of the main means for restoring damaged ecosystems that are impacted by global change. This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of environmental factors on ecosystem function (net ecosystem exchange (NEE), evapotranspiration (ET), and water use efficiency (WUE)) in an artificial sand-binding vegetation desert (with dominant shrubs, such as Artemisia ordosica and Caragana korshinskii, and herbaceous plants) in northwestern China. NEE, ET, and meteorological data were observed with the eddy covariance (EC) technique. The random forest (RF) method was used to identify major environmental factors that affected NEE, ET, and WUE. Our results showed that the mean annual NEE, ET, and WUE values were - 112.4 g C m

Indexed as

EcosystemSandCarbon CycleCarbon DioxideChinaSeasonsCarbon DioxideSandArtificial sand-binding vegetationEddy covarianceEvapotranspirationNet ecosystem exchangeRandom forestWater use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID32072426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.