ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Social capital and the use of organic fertilizer: an empirical analysis of Hubei Province in China.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Agricultural Division of Labor on Fertilizer Reduction Application: Evidence from Western China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Assessing psychological factors on farmers' intention to apply organic manure: an application of extended theory of planned behavior.Environment, development and sustainability · 2022Article
- Influence and Action Mechanisms of Governmental Relations Embeddedness for Fostering Green Production Demonstration Household: Evidence from Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Anhui Province, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Coordinated development of high-quality agricultural transformation and technological innovation: a case study of main grain-producing areas, China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Does E-commerce participation increase the use intensity of organic fertilizers in fruit production?-Evidence from China.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the context of zero chemical fertilizer growth, using organic instead of chemical fertilizers is the inevitable future of agricultural production, and social capital may be an important factor that affects whether farmers choose organic or chemical fertilizer. Based on a survey data from 1116 farmers in Hubei Province, this paper analyzes the influence of social capital and its three sub-dimensions (political identity, interpersonal trust, and relationship network) on farmer fertilizer choice. It also explores the mechanism and the degree of influence and examines how the primary effect differs across three sub-dimensions of social capital. The results show the following: (1) Social capital has a positive and statistically significant effect on the adoption of organic manure; (2) Three sub-dimensions of social capital promote the use of organic manure, although there are large differences in their degrees of influence. In detail, interpersonal trust had the greatest effect, followed by political identity, while relationship network was less effective; (3) Social capital has a positive influence on farmers' opportunity perception, risk aversion, production skills, and production supply, which further affect farmers' fertilizer choices. This paper enriches the research findings of social capital theory on the micro level of farmers' green production behavior. The conclusion is of great practical significance to activate the substitution of organic fertilizer for chemical fertilizer and promote the green transformation of agricultural development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32072416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.