Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32072326›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Adopting a collaborative approach in developing a prehabilitation program for patients with prostate cancer utilising experience-based co-design methodology.

Clarice Y Tang, Monica Turczyniak, Alesha Sayner, Kimberley Haines, Sally Butzkueven, Helen E O'Connell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Enhancing the provision of cancer nutrition information to support care through experience-based co-design: a mixed-methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. "It has to be more than exercise": exploring multiple perspectives to community-based exercise program design for persons with breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Co-design of a cancer nutrition care pathway by patients, carers, and health professionals: the CanEAT pathway.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Patient and carer experiences of nutrition in cancer care: a mixed-methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clarice Y TangDepartment of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Gordon Street, Footscray, VIC, 3011, Australia. Clarice.tang@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-1816
Monica TurczyniakDepartment of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Gordon Street, Footscray, VIC, 3011, Australia.
Alesha SaynerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Gordon Street, Footscray, VIC, 3011, Australia.
Kimberley HainesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Gordon Street, Footscray, VIC, 3011, Australia.
Sally ButzkuevenDepartment of Cancer Services, Western Health, Furlong Road, St Albans, VIC, 3011, Australia.
Helen E O'ConnellDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

Department of Health and Human Services, State Government of Victoria Western and Central Melbourne Integrated Cancer Services
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEngaging patients in a prehabilitation program prior to commencement of cancer treatment is a known challenge. Utilising experience-based co-design (EBCD) methodology, this study aimed to explore the prostate cancer treatment journey from the perspectives of the patient and health professionals and collaboratively develop a prehabilitation program for patients with prostate cancer.

methodsEBCD was utilised for this study. Patients, support persons and health professionals were selectively identified and recruited from two metropolitan health services in Melbourne. Selection criteria included (i) recent clinical/patient experience with prostate cancer treatment and (ii) willingness to share positive experiences and challenges in two 2-hour face-to-face workshops. Findings from these workshops were thematically analysed to identify key themes addressing aims of the study.

resultsTwenty participants including eight patients, one support person and 11 health professionals were recruited. Four key touchpoints were identified. All participants acknowledged positive interactions between patients and health professionals. Patients often described the journey as lonely, stressful and frustrating especially prior to commencement of treatment. A lack of a consistent approach in identifying and preparing patients with prostate cancer for treatment was identified. A structured prehabilitation program was proposed as a solution. Practical ideas to be implemented including timing of commencement, educational content and strategies to boost engagement were formulated.

conclusionsThe findings from the study provided practical guidance for future clinicians when implementing a prehabilitation program. Future study is required to evaluate the effectiveness of such a prehabilitation program in improving patient engagement and preparedness for prostate cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsAgedHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPreoperative CareProstatic NeoplasmsQualitative ResearchExperience-based co-designPrehabilitationProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.