Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32072282›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a case-matched multicenter study.

Sameh Hany Emile, Amr Madyan, Tarek Mahdy, Ayman Elshobaky, Hosam Ghazy Elbanna, Mohamed Anwar Abdel-Razik

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sameh Hany EmileGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. Sameh200@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7854-5244
Amr MadyanGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Tarek MahdyGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ayman ElshobakyGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Hosam Ghazy ElbannaGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed Anwar Abdel-RazikGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study aimed to compare the outcome of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in regards weight loss, improvement in comorbidities at 12 months of follow-up, and postoperative complications.

methodsThis was a case-matched, multicenter analysis of the outcome of patients who underwent SG or SASI bypass. Patients who underwent SASI bypass were matched with an equal number of patients who underwent SG in terms of age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities. The main outcome measures were excess weight loss (EWL) at 6 and 12 months after surgery, improvement in medical comorbidities, and complications.

resultsA total of 116 patients (97 female) of a mean age of 35.8 years were included. Fifty-eight patients underwent SASI bypass and an equal number underwent SG. %EWL at 6 months postoperatively was similar between the two groups. SASI bypass conferred significantly higher %EWL at 12 months than SG (72.6 Vs 60.4, p < 0.0001). Improvement in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after SASI bypass was better than SG (95.8% Vs 70% and 85.7% Vs 18.2%, respectively). SASI bypass required longer operation time than SG (108.7 Vs 92.8 min, p < 0.0001). Complications occurred in 12 (20.7%) patients after SG and 4 (6.9%) patients after SASI bypass (p = 0.056).

conclusionThe %EWL at 12 months after SASI bypass was significantly higher than after SG. SASI bypass conferred better improvement in T2DM and GERD than SG. Both procedures had similar weight loss at 6 months postoperatively and comparable complication rates.

Indexed as

AdultAnastomosis, SurgicalCase-Control StudiesComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGastrectomyGastroesophageal RefluxHumansIleumMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesBypassCase-matchedSASISingle anastomosisSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID32072282
OpenAlexW3008922425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.