Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32072101›Full record

ArticlePain reports

The feasibility and acceptability of research magnetic resonance imaging in adolescents with moderate-severe neuropathic pain.

Madeleine Verriotis, Massieh Moayedi, Clarissa Sorger, Judy Peters, Kiran Seunarine, Christopher A Clark, Suellen M Walker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Barriers and facilitators for participation in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in cancer research: a feasibility and acceptability analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Developmental mechanisms of CPSP: Clinical observations and translational laboratory evaluations.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Madeleine VerriotisPain Research, Developmental Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Massieh MoayediCentre for Multimodal Sensorimotor and Pain Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Clarissa SorgerPain Research, Developmental Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Judy PetersPain Research, Developmental Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Kiran SeunarineDevelopmental Imaging and Biophysics Section, Developmental Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher A ClarkDevelopmental Imaging and Biophysics Section, Developmental Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Suellen M WalkerPain Research, Developmental Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultimodal characterisation with questionnaires, Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST), and neuroimaging will improve understanding of neuropathic pain (NeuP) in adolescents. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data in adolescents with NeuP are limited, and the perceived practical or ethical burden of scanning may represent a barrier to research.

objectiveTo determine the feasibility of MRI scanning in adolescents with moderate-severe NeuP, with respect to consent rate, postscan acceptability, and data quality.

methodsThis prospective cohort study evaluating questionnaires and QST recruited adolescents aged 10 to 18 years with clinically diagnosed NeuP from a tertiary clinic. Eligible adolescents aged 11 years and older could additionally agree/decline an MRI scan. After the scan, families rated discomfort, perceived risk, and acceptability of current and future MRI scans (0-10 numerical rating scales). Head motion during scanning was compared with healthy controls to assess data quality.

resultsThirty-four families agreed to MRI (72% recruitment), and 21 adolescents with moderate-severe pain (average last week 6.7 ± 1.7; mean ± SD) and with neuropathic QST profiles were scanned. Three adolescents reported positional or noise-related discomfort during scanning. Perceived risk was low, and acceptability of the current scan was high for parents (range [median]: 7 to 10/10 [10]) and adolescents (8-10/10 [10]). Willingness to undergo a future research scan was high for parents (7-10/10 [10]) and adolescents (5-10/10 [10]) and did not differ from future scans for clinical purposes. Mean head motion during resting state functional MRI did not differ from control adolescents.

conclusionResearch MRI is feasible and acceptable for many adolescents with moderate-severe NeuP.

Indexed as

AdolescentsChildrenMagnetic resonance imagingNeuropathic painPain

Identifiers

PMID32072101
PMCPMC7004507
OpenAlexW3000964552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.