Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32072095›Full record

ArticlePain reports

The Quebec Low Back Pain Study: a protocol for an innovative 2-tier provincial cohort.

Gabrielle M Pagé, Anaïs Lacasse, Quebec Back Pain Consortium (in alphabetical order), Nicolas Beaudet, Manon Choinière, Simon Deslauriers, Luda Diatchenko, Laurent Dupuis, Stéphanie Grégoire, Richard Hovey and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Challenges and opportunities for omics-based precision medicine in chronic low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Gabrielle M PagéDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anaïs LacasseDépartment des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, QC, Canada.
Quebec Back Pain Consortium (in alphabetical order)
Nicolas BeaudetQuebec Pain Research Network, QC, Canada.
Manon ChoinièreDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Simon DeslauriersCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS, CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Luda DiatchenkoAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada.
Laurent DupuisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Stéphanie GrégoireAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada.
Richard HoveyAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada.
Erwan LeclairQuebec Pain Research Network, QC, Canada.
Guillaume LeonardSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Center on Aging, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Carolina B MelotoAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada.
Francesca MontagnaAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada.
Alexandre ParentQuebec Pain Research Network, QC, Canada.
Pierre RainvilleCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Jean-Sébastien RoyCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS, CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Mathieu RoyCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Mark A WareCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Timothy H WidemanCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Laura S StoneCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
McGill University · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAQuebec Rehabilitation Research Network · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CAUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe neurobiological mechanisms underlying recovery from or persistence of low back pain (LBP) remain misunderstood, limiting progress toward effective management. We have developed an innovative two-tier design to study the transition from acute to chronic LBP. The objective of the first tier is to create a provincial web-based infrastructure to recruit and monitor the trajectory of individuals with acute LBP. The objective of the second tier is to fuel hypothesis-driven satellite data collection centers with specialized expertise to study the role of biomechanical, epigenetic, genetic, neuroanatomical, ontological, physiological, psychological, and socioeconomic factors in LBP chronicity.

methodsThis article describes the first tier of the protocol: establishment of the Core Dataset and Cohort. Adults with acute LBP will be recruited through networks, media, and health care settings. A web-based interface will be used to collect self-reported variables at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Acute LBP will be defined according to the Dionne 2008 consensus. Measurements will include the Canadian minimum data set for chronic LBP research, DN4 for neuropathic pain, comorbidities, EQ-5D-5L for quality of life, and linkage with provincial medico-administrative databases. The primary outcome will be the transition to chronic LBP, as defined by Deyo 2014. Secondary outcomes include health care resource utilization, disability, sick leave, mood, and quality of life. PERSPECTIVE: This study brings together diverse research expertise to investigate the transition from acute to chronic LBP, characterize the progression to recovery or chronicity, and identify patterns associated with that progression.

Indexed as

acutechronicinception cohortlow back painpersistencetwo-stage sampling

Identifiers

PMID32072095
PMCPMC7004506
OpenAlexW2994701006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.