Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32071940›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2020

The New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire: Unsuitable as an Outcome in Clinical Trials?

Femke Hulzinga, Alice Nieuwboer, Bauke W Dijkstra, Martina Mancini, Carolien Strouwen, Bastiaan R Bloem, Pieter Ginis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05325541 (Effects of Visual Biofeedback Therapy on Balance, Freezing of Gait and Cognition Among Stage III Parkinson's Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05325541 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Visual Biofeedback Therapy on Balance, Freezing of Gait and Cognition Among Stage III Parkinson's Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZiauddin UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled36ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsVisual Biofeedback Therapy, Conventional Balance exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effectiveness of a dance-physiotherapy combined intervention in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled pilot trial.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What is new in Freezing of Gait?Journal of neurology · 2026
    Review
  12. An updated definition of freezing of gait.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Neuromodulation of Cortical Targets in Freezing of Gait.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Femke HulzingaKU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group Leuven Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3935-7256
Alice NieuwboerKU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group Leuven Belgium.
Bauke W DijkstraKU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group Leuven Belgium.
Martina ManciniDepartment of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Carolien StrouwenUHasselt, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Rehabilitation Research Center Hasselt Belgium.
Bastiaan R BloemRadboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders Nijmegen the Netherlands.
Pieter GinisKU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group Leuven Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFreezing of gait (FOG) is a common gait deficit in Parkinson's disease. The New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q) is a widely used and valid tool to quantify freezing of gait severity. However, its test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change remain unknown.

objectiveTo determine the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the NFOG-Q.

methodsTwo groups of freezers, involved in 2 previous rehabilitation trials, completed the NFOG-Q at 2 time points (T1 and T2), separated by a 6-week control period without active intervention. Sample 1 (N = 57) was measured in ON and sample 2 (N = 14) in OFF. We calculated various reliability statistics for the NFOG-Q scores between T1 and T2 as well as correlation coefficients with clinical descriptors to explain the variability between time points.

resultsIn sample 1 the NFOG-Q showed modest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.68 [0.52-0.80]) without differences between T1 and T2. However, a minimal detectable change of 9.95 (7.90-12.27) points emerged for the total score (range 28 points, relative minimal detectable change of 35.5%). Sample 2 showed largely similar results. We found no associations between cognitive-related or disease severity-related outcomes and variability in NFOG-Q scores.

conclusionsWe conclude that the NFOG-Q is insufficiently reliable or responsive to detect small effect sizes, as changes need to go beyond 35% to surpass measurement error. Therefore, we warrant caution in using the NFOG-Q as a primary outcome in clinical trials. These results emphasize the need for robust and objective freezing of gait outcome measures.

Indexed as

freezing of gaitminimal detectable changenew freezing of gait questionnairereliability

Identifiers

PMID32071940
PMCPMC7011794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.