Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32071693›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2020

Comparison of modified Bass, Fones and normal tooth brushing technique for the efficacy of plaque control in young adults- A randomized clinical trial.

Chandrashekar Janakiram, Naveen Varghese, Ramanarayanan Venkitachalam, Joe Joseph, Karuveettil Vineetha

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characterizing the Content Related to Oral Health Education on TikTok.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chandrashekar JanakiramProfessor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry. Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, AIMS, Ponekkara P. O., Kochi 682041.
Naveen VargheseProfessor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry. Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, AIMS, Ponekkara P. O., Kochi 682041.
Ramanarayanan VenkitachalamProfessor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry. Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, AIMS, Ponekkara P. O., Kochi 682041.
Joe JosephProfessor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry. Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, AIMS, Ponekkara P. O., Kochi 682041.
Karuveettil VineethaProfessor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry. Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, AIMS, Ponekkara P. O., Kochi 682041.
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the anti plaque efficacy of Modified Bass, Fones and Normal brushing techniques in young adults. MATERIAL AND

methodsAn investigator blinded randomized controlled trial with parallel design was adopted to compare the anti plaque efficacy of three tooth brushing techniques. The study population consisted of 120 dental students aged between 18 and 30 years.

resultsAt the baseline, the mean plaque scores were 0.74 ± 0.39, 0.77 ± 0.34 and 0.98 ± 0.36 respectively, for Modified Bass, Fones and Normal brushing technique. After 24 hours without any oral hygiene activity, the plaque scores increased to 1.04 ± 0.30, 1.11 ± 0.32 and 1.21 ± 0.40, respectively. After 1 week of using the intervention, the mean plaque scores were 0.78 ± 0.36, 0.94 ± 0.34 and 1.03 ± 0.43, respectively and increased to 1.13 ± 0.44, 1.14 ± 0.40 and 1.08 ± 0.34 after 28 days. The mean gingival scores were 0.23 ± 0.66, 0.02 ± 0.52 and 0.42 ± 0.74 for Modified Bass, Fones and Normal Brushing technique during baseline visit and after 28 days.

conclusionsThere was a significant reduction in the amount of plaque with the three brushing techniques. Although the short-term outcomes with the Modified Bass method were promising, a long-term effect was not evident. Further, there was no significant difference in plaque control between the three groups.

Identifiers

PMID32071693
PMCPMC7018473
OpenAlexW3004398094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.