ArticleJournal of vascular and interventional neurology2020
The Post-Pipeline Headache: New Headaches Following Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysm.
Article in Journal of vascular and interventional neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-pipeline headache after flow-diverting stenting for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: clinical, radiological findings, and proposed scoring system.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Effect of exercise-nutrition-psychology oriented nursing in patients undergoing interventional embolization for intracranial aneurysm.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFlow diversion using devices such as the "pipeline" stent is now a common treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Though much is known about the efficacy of the device, less is reported regarding potential side effects. In this study, we report the frequency and characteristics of the "post-pipeline headache."
methodsWe prospectively enrolled a cohort of 222 patients who underwent pipeline stenting for the treatment of intracranial aneurysm between 2015 and 2018. A follow-up telephone survey was conducted with a mean 21.6 months postprocedure evaluating postprocedure headaches and previous headache history. A post-pipeline headache was defined as a new headache or pain distinct from their prior headache syndrome. Information was collected regarding patient demographics, headache characteristics, headache history, and whether symptoms were ongoing. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with post-pipeline headache and the risk of long-term headache persistence.
resultsEighty-eight individuals were reached by phone for follow-up; 48 (55%) of whom reported a new headache postprocedure. Patients experiencing post-pipeline headache were more likely to be young (OR 0.9; 95% CI: 0.85-0.94) and have a history of prior headaches (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.02-5.81). Associated motor (OR 6.1; 95% CI: 1.19-31.47), cognitive (OR 7.0; 95% CI: 081-60.33), visual (OR 5.4; 95% CI: 1.05-27.89), and vestibular (OR 4.8; 95% CI: 1.14-20.23) symptoms were associated with ongoing headache.
conclusionsPost-pipeline headache is common, particularly in younger individuals with prior headache history, and has distinctive features. Symptoms can remit over time; however, two-thirds experience ongoing headaches, particularly those with associated migrainous features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32071670PMC6998808W3012329624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.