Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32071434›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2020

The microbiome and gynaecological cancer development, prevention and therapy.

Paweł Łaniewski, Zehra Esra Ilhan, Melissa M Herbst-Kralovetz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 276 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
276citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

276 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 447 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. mBio · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Gut-reproduction axis: genome-wide pleiotropic and prospective evidence linking inflammatory bowel disease with gynecological disorders.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

216 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paweł ŁaniewskiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine-Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-2173
Zehra Esra IlhanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine-Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Melissa M Herbst-KralovetzDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine-Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA. mherbst1@email.arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8540-5917
University of Arizona · US

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Teri L Bankhead · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
Uranium as an Environmental Risk Factor for Cancer Among the NavajoU54CA143924 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Gloria D. Coronado · 2009 to 2026
$26.7M
Role of interleukin-36gamma in genital HSV-2 pathogenesisR15AI113457 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HERBST-KRALOVETZ, MELISSA MARIE · 2015 to 2015
$454k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143924NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI113457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The female reproductive tract (FRT), similar to other mucosal sites, harbours a site-specific microbiome, which has an essential role in maintaining health and homeostasis. In the majority of women of reproductive age, the microbiota of the lower FRT (vagina and cervix) microenvironment is dominated by Lactobacillus species, which benefit the host through symbiotic relationships. By contrast, the upper FRT (uterus, Fallopian tubes and ovaries) might be sterile in healthy individuals or contain a low-biomass microbiome with a diverse mixture of microorganisms. When dysbiosis occurs, altered immune and metabolic signalling can affect hallmarks of cancer, including chronic inflammation, epithelial barrier breach, changes in cellular proliferation and apoptosis, genome instability, angiogenesis and metabolic dysregulation. These pathophysiological changes might lead to gynaecological cancer. Emerging evidence shows that genital dysbiosis and/or specific bacteria might have an active role in the development and/or progression and metastasis of gynaecological malignancies, such as cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancers, through direct and indirect mechanisms, including modulation of oestrogen metabolism. Cancer therapies might also alter microbiota at sites throughout the body. Reciprocally, microbiota composition can influence the efficacy and toxic effects of cancer therapies, as well as quality of life following cancer treatment. Modulation of the microbiome via probiotics or microbiota transplant might prove useful in improving responsiveness to cancer treatment and quality of life. Elucidating these complex host-microbiome interactions, including the crosstalk between distal and local sites, will translate into interventions for prevention, therapeutic efficacy and toxic effects to enhance health outcomes for women with gynaecological cancers.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisAnti-Infective AgentsBacteria, AnaerobicCervix UteriDysbiosisEstrogensFallopian TubesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenitalia, FemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansLactobacillusMicrobiotaOvaryProbioticsAnti-Infective AgentsEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID32071434
PMCPMC9977514
OpenAlexW3007674389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.