Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32071371›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Safety and efficacy of a mesenchymal stem cell intramammary therapy in dairy cows with experimentally induced Staphylococcus aureus clinical mastitis.

O A Peralta, C Carrasco, C Vieytes, M J Tamayo, I Muñoz, S Sepulveda, T Tadich, M Duchens, P Melendez, A Mella and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Contributions of large and agricultural animal models to immunology.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Veterinary Medicine-Still Untapped Potential.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

O A PeraltaDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, 8820808, Chile. operalta@uchile.cl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2040-4902
C CarrascoDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, 8820808, Chile.
C VieytesDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, 8820808, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-5694
M J TamayoDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, 8820808, Chile.
I MuñozDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, 8820808, Chile.
S SepulvedaDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, 8820808, Chile.
T TadichDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, 8820808, Chile.
M DuchensDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, 8820808, Chile.
P MelendezFood Animal Health & Management Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
A MellaMastitis Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Austral University of Chile, Valdivia, 5110566, Chile.
C G TorresDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, 8820808, Chile.
University of Chile · CLAustral University of Chile · CLUniversity of Georgia · USVirginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although, antibiotics are effective in the treatment of bovine mastitis, they do not address the regeneration of mammary glandular tissue and have been associated to the increment in antimicrobial resistance worldwide. Considering the necessity of alternative therapies for this disease of high economic impact and the reported regenerative and antibacterial effects of mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of an allogenic MSC-based intramammary therapy in dairy cows with experimentally induced Staphylococcus aureus clinical mastitis. In a safety trial, heifers were inoculated intramammarily with a 2.5 × 10

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyAnimalsCattleFemaleLactationMammary Glands, AnimalMastitis, BovineMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMilkStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID32071371
PMCPMC7028716
OpenAlexW3008569977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.