Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32071192›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Development of a casemix classification to predict costs of home care in the Netherlands: a study protocol.

Arianne Mathilda Josephus Elissen, Gertjan Sebastiaan Verhoeven, Maud Hortense de Korte, Anne Odilia Emile van den Bulck, Silke Friederike Metzelthin, Lieuwe Christiaan van der Weij, Jaap Stam, Dirk Ruwaard, Misja Chiljon Mikkers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arianne Mathilda Josephus ElissenDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands a.elissen@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9795-8095
Gertjan Sebastiaan VerhoevenDutch Healthcare Authority, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maud Hortense de KorteDutch Healthcare Authority, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anne Odilia Emile van den BulckDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Silke Friederike MetzelthinHealth Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lieuwe Christiaan van der WeijDutch Healthcare Authority, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jaap StamDutch Healthcare Authority, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dirk RuwaardDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Misja Chiljon MikkersDutch Healthcare Authority, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCompared with fee-for-service systems, prospective payment based on casemix classification is thought to promote more efficient, needs-based care provision. We aim to develop a casemix classification to predict the costs of home care in the Netherlands. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The research is designed as a multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study using quantitative methods to identify the relative cost predictors of home care and combine these into a casemix classification, based on individual episodes of care. The dependent variable in the analyses is the cost of home care utilisation, which is operationalised through various measures of formal and informal care, weighted by the relative wage rates of staff categories. As independent variables, we will use data from a recently developed Casemix Short-Form questionnaire, combined with client information from participating home care providers' (nursing) classification systems and data on demographics and care category (ie, a classification mandated by health insurers). Cost predictors are identified using random forest variable importance measures, and then used to build regression tree models. The casemix classification will consist of the leaves of the (pruned) regression tree. Internal validation is addressed by using cross-validation at various stages of the modelling pathways. The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis statement was used to prepare this study protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was classified by an accredited Medical Research Ethics Committee as not subject to the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. Findings are expected in 2020 and will serve as input for the development of a new payment system for home care in the Netherlands, to be implemented at the discretion of the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports. The results will also be published in peer-reviewed publications and policy briefs, and presented at (inter)national conferences.

Indexed as

Diagnosis-Related GroupsHealth Care CostsHome Care ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesFee-for-Service PlansForecastingHumansNetherlandshealth economicshealth policyorganisation of health servicesstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID32071192
PMCPMC7044927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.