Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32070812›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Somatosensory evoked fields predict response to vagus nerve stimulation.

Karim Mithani, Simeon M Wong, Mirriam Mikhail, Haatef Pourmotabbed, Elizabeth Pang, Roy Sharma, Ivanna Yau, Ayako Ochi, Hiroshi Otsubo, O Carter Snead and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Factors predicting the response to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in pediatric patients with drug- resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karim MithaniFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Simeon M WongInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mirriam MikhailFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Haatef PourmotabbedDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA; Neuroscience Institute, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Elizabeth PangDivision of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Roy SharmaDivision of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Ivanna YauDivision of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Ayako OchiDivision of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Hiroshi OtsuboDivision of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
O Carter SneadDivision of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Elizabeth DonnerDivision of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Cristina GoDivision of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Elysa WidjajaInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Abbas Babajani-FeremiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA; Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA; Neuroscience Institute, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
George M IbrahimInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: george.ibrahim@sickkids.ca.
Hospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an unmet need to develop robust predictive algorithms to preoperatively identify pediatric epilepsy patients who will respond to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Given the similarity in the neural circuitry between vagus and median nerve afferent projections to the primary somatosensory cortex, the current study hypothesized that median nerve somatosensory evoked field(s) (SEFs) could be used to predict seizure response to VNS. Retrospective data from forty-eight pediatric patients who underwent VNS at two different institutions were used in this study. Thirty-six patients ("Discovery Cohort") underwent preoperative electrical median nerve stimulation during magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings and 12 patients ("Validation Cohort") underwent preoperative pneumatic stimulation during MEG. SEFs and their spatial deviation, waveform amplitude and latency, and event-related connectivity were calculated for all patients. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was trained on the Discovery Cohort to differentiate responders from non-responders based on these input features and tested on the Validation Cohort by comparing the model-predicted response to VNS to the known response. We found that responders to VNS had significantly more widespread SEF localization and greater functional connectivity within limbic and sensorimotor networks in response to median nerve stimulation. No difference in SEF amplitude or latencies was observed between the two cohorts. The SVM classifier demonstrated 88.9% accuracy (0.93 area under the receiver operator characteristics curve) on cross-validation, which decreased to 67% in the Validation cohort. By leveraging overlapping neural circuitry, we found that median nerve SEF characteristics and functional connectivity could identify responders to VNS.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAdolescentAfferent PathwaysChildConnectomeDrug Resistant EpilepsyEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMedian NerveRetrospective StudiesSomatosensory CortexTreatment OutcomeVagus Nerve StimulationConnectomicsEvoked potentialsMachine learningSEFVNS

Identifiers

PMID32070812
PMCPMC7026289
OpenAlexW3005099648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.