Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32070674›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2020

Implementation of a three-tiered approach to identify and characterize anti-drug antibodies raised against HIV-specific broadly neutralizing antibodies.

Pranay Bharadwaj, Cassidy Riekofski, Shu Lin, Michael S Seaman, David A Garber, David Montefiori, Marcella Sarzotti-Kelsoe, Margaret E Ackerman, Joshua A Weiner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical translation of immunomodulatory therapeutics.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pranay BharadwajDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Cassidy RiekofskiThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Shu LinThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Michael S SeamanCenter for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
David A GarberDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
David MontefioriDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Marcella Sarzotti-KelsoeDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Margaret E AckermanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. Electronic address: margaret.e.ackerman@dartmouth.edu.
Joshua A WeinerThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Dartmouth College · USDuke Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to detect, quantify, and interrogate the properties of immune responses raised against biological therapeutics is not only important to our understanding of these molecules, but also to their success in the clinic. A tiered assay approach to identify the presence, specificity, and titer of anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses has been adopted as a gold standard by industry leaders, the FDA, and the EMA. In order to support pre-clinical and clinical trials, these assays must be standardized, and their performance sufficiently characterized to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of results under relevant testing conditions. Here we present implementation of electrochemiluminiscence assays that fit into the tiered paradigm of ADA testing for five HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies (3BNC117, 3BNC117-LS, 10-1074, PGT121, and PGDM1400) in compliance with Good Clinical Laboratory practices. Assay sensitivities and matrix effects were evaluated and used to inform the development of positivity cut points. Once cut points were established, assay precision, specificity, free-drug tolerance, and robustness were defined. In all cases, assay characteristics met or surpassed recommendations set forth by the FDA. To further evaluate the performance of these assays and the tiered approach, samples from non-human primates that had received a subset of the five therapeutics were evaluated. In sum, this study reports qualification of a set of ADA assays available to the scientific community as pre-clinical and clinical trials of broadly HIV-neutralizing antibodies proceed, and a framework that is easily adapted as new drug products are advanced in the clinic.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesElectrochemical TechniquesHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansImmunotherapyLuminescent MeasurementsReference StandardsSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesHIV AntibodiesAnti-drug antibodyBroadly neutralizing antibodyHIVSafety

Identifiers

PMID32070674
PMCPMC7103756
OpenAlexW3006410024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.