Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32070351›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

Dromedary camel CD14

Jamal Hussen, Turke Shawaf, Abdullah I A Al-Mubarak, Naser Abdallah Al Humam, Faisal Almathen, Hans-Joachim Schuberth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent Advances in Camel Immunology.Frontiers in immunology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jamal HussenDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia. jhussen@kfu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8942-005X
Turke ShawafDepartment of Clinical Studies, College of Veterinary Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah I A Al-MubarakDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Naser Abdallah Al HumamDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal AlmathenDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Animal Husbandry, College of Veterinary Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Hans-Joachim SchuberthImmunology Unit, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
King Faisal University · SAUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn human and different animal species, blood monocytes are classified based on their expression pattern of different monocytic markers into phenotypically and functionally different subsets. In the current study, we used flow cytometry and monoclonal antibodies to CD172a, CD14, CD163 and MHCII to identify monocyte subsets in peripheral blood of dromedary camels.

resultsBased on CD14, CD163 and MHCII expression, camel CD172a + monocytes were divided into three subsets: The major subpopulation of camel monocytes (mo-I) showed high expression of CD14 and CD163, but low expression of MHCII. A second subset of monocytes (mo-II) expressed highly all three markers, CD14, CD163 and MHCII. A third monocyte subset (mo-III) displayed low expression of CD14 and CD163 with high MHCII expression. While the two MHCII

conclusionsCamel monocyte subsets, mo-I, mo-II and mo-III are counterparts of bovine classical, intermediate and non-classical monocytes respectively. The distribution of camel monocyte subsets is influenced by age.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntibodies, MonoclonalCamelusFlow CytometryMonocytesPhagocytosisPhenotypeReactive Oxygen SpeciesStaphylococcus aureusAntibodies, MonoclonalReactive Oxygen SpeciesAdhesion moleculesDromedary camelFlow cytometryMonocyte subsetsPhagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID32070351
PMCPMC7027094
OpenAlexW3012745656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.