Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32070318›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

What's PrEP?: peer navigator acceptability among minority MSM in Washington.

Jade Pagkas-Bather, Jahn Jaramillo, Jsani Henry, Vanessa Grandberry, Luis F Ramirez, Lorenzo Cervantes, Joanne D Stekler, Michele P Andrasik, Susan M Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Development of An Acceptance Based PrEP Intervention (Journal of contextual behavioral science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jade Pagkas-BatherDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. jpagkasbather@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1003-3995
Jahn JaramilloCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Jsani HenrySeattle & King County Public Health HIV/STD Program, Seattle, WA, USA.
Vanessa GrandberryCenter for MultiCultural Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Luis F RamirezEntre Hermanos, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lorenzo CervantesPierce County AIDS Foundation, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Joanne D SteklerDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michele P AndrasikFred Hutchinson Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Seattle, USA.
Susan M GrahamDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EDWIN ROBERTO ORELLANA · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
HOST DEFENSE TRAINING IN ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASEST32AI007044 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVID Neal FREDRICKS · 1985 to 2026
$14.6M
Third Coast HIV-Related Cardiovascular and Sleep Disorders K12 Career Development ProgramK12HL143959 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ARDEHALI, HOSSEIN, SCHNEIDER, JOHN · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington AI027757NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL143959NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeer navigation is a promising strategy to link at-risk minority men who have sex with men (MSM) to HIV prevention services including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

methodsThirty-two Black and 63 Latinx HIV-negative MSM living in western Washington completed a survey examining attitudes towards peer navigation and PrEP. Factor analysis derived a score for peer navigator acceptability, and linear regression identified associations with this outcome.

resultsForty-eight percent were interested in peer navigation. Being insured, higher sexual stigma, and higher PHQ-9 score were associated with higher acceptability, while higher income and having a regular medical provider were associated with lower acceptability. In multivariable analysis, higher sexual stigma predicted higher acceptability, while higher income predicted lower acceptability. Men preferred that peers be matched on sexual orientation, race, age and culture.

conclusionPeer navigation interventions to reach minority men should address stigma, focus on lower-income men, and try to match peers to clients to the extent possible.

Indexed as

Patient NavigationPeer GroupPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultBlack or African AmericanHispanic or LatinoHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesWashingtonBlackHIV preventionLatinxMen who have sex with menPre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID32070318
PMCPMC7029512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.