ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020
Not just numbers: beyond counting caesarean deliveries to understanding their determinants in Ghana using a population based cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence on prevalence of caesarean sections and factors influencing uptake in Ghana: a scoping review.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Evidence on prevalence of caesarean sections and factors influencing uptake in Ghana: a scoping review protocol.Global health action · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Determinants of Caesarean Section Deliveries in Ghana: A Population-Based Cross-sectional Study.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Prediction of caesarean section birth using machine learning algorithms among pregnant women in a district hospital in Ghana.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Strengthening caesarean birth: Sub-Saharan Africa health system evaluation: Scoping review.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024Article
- Determinants of cesarean mode of childbirth among Rwandan women of childbearing age: Evidence from the 2019-2020 Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (RDHS).Public health challenges · 2024Article
- Preference and Associated Factors for Cesarean Delivery Among Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2024Article
- A Higher Maternal Education Level Could Be a Critical Factor in the Exceeded Cesarean Section Delivery in Indonesia.Iranian journal of public health · 2024Article
- Caesarean section delivery rates and associated factors in a faith-based referral hospital in Ghana: A retrospective analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Maternal vaginal fluids play a major role in the colonization of the neonatal intestinal microbiota.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Fetal outcomes and their correlates following caesarian section in a rural setting in Ghana.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Rural-urban disparities in caesarean deliveries in sub-Saharan Africa: a multivariate non-linear decomposition modelling of Demographic and Health Survey data.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Assessment and determinants of acute post-caesarean section pain in a tertiary facility in Ghana.PloS one · 2022Article
- Association between media exposure and family planning in Myanmar and Philippines: evidence from nationally representative survey data.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2021Article
- Understanding the association between exposure to family planning messages and consistent condom use among never married men in Ghana.PloS one · 2021Article
- Predictors of home births among rural women in Ghana: analysis of data from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing rate of caesarean deliveries (CD) has become a serious concern for public health experts globally. Despite this health concern, research on factors associated CD in many low- and -middle countries like Ghana is sparse. This study, therefore, assessed the prevalence and determinants of CD among child-bearing women aged 15-49 in Ghana.
methodsThe study used data from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. The analysis was limited to mothers (n = 2742) aged 15-49 , who had given birth in health facilities 5 years preceding the survey. Association between CD and its determinants was assessed by calculating adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals using a binary logistic regression.
resultsThe percentage of mothers who delivered their babies through caesarean section (CS) was 18.5%. Using multivariable logistic regression, the results showed that women aged 45-49 (AOR = 10.5; 95% CI: 3.0-37.4), and women from a household that are headed by a female (AOR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1-1.7) had higher odds to deliver through CS. Women from the Upper East (AOR =0.4; 95% CI = 0.2-0.7) and Upper West (AOR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2-0.8) regions had lower odds to deliver their children through CS. Women with parity 4 or more (AOR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.2-0.5) had lower odds of CD compared to those with parity 1. Women with female babies had lower odds (AOR = 0.8; CI = 0.7-0.9) of delivering them through CS compared to those with male children.
conclusionThe percentage of women delivering babies through the CS in Ghana is high. The high rates of CD noted do not essentially indicate good quality care or services. Hence, health facilities offering this medical protocol need to adopt comprehensive and strict measures to ensure detailed medical justifications by doctors for performing these caesarean surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.