Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32070303›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Not just numbers: beyond counting caesarean deliveries to understanding their determinants in Ghana using a population based cross-sectional study.

Abdul-Aziz Seidu, John Elvis Hagan, Wonder Agbemavi, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, Edmond Banafo Nartey, Eugene Budu, Francis Sambah, Thomas Schack

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Strengthening caesarean birth: Sub-Saharan Africa health system evaluation: Scoping review.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Abdul-Aziz SeiduDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana. abdul-aziz.seidu@stu.ucc.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-9054
John Elvis HaganDepartment of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3530-6133
Wonder AgbemaviDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5626-6543
Bright Opoku AhinkorahThe Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research (ACPPHR), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-895X
Edmond Banafo NarteyGhana Health Service, Abura Dunkwa Health Directorate, Abura Dunkwa, Ghana.
Eugene BuduDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-9225
Francis SambahDepartment of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4245-7028
Thomas SchackNeurocognition and Action-Biomechanics Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Sport Sciences, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
University of Cape Coast · GHBielefeld University · DEGhana Health Service · GHUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing rate of caesarean deliveries (CD) has become a serious concern for public health experts globally. Despite this health concern, research on factors associated CD in many low- and -middle countries like Ghana is sparse. This study, therefore, assessed the prevalence and determinants of CD among child-bearing women aged 15-49  in Ghana.

methodsThe study used data from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. The analysis was limited to mothers (n = 2742) aged 15-49 , who had given birth in health facilities 5 years preceding the survey. Association between CD and its determinants was assessed by calculating adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals using a binary logistic regression.

resultsThe percentage of mothers who delivered their babies through caesarean section (CS) was 18.5%. Using multivariable logistic regression, the results showed that women aged 45-49 (AOR = 10.5; 95% CI: 3.0-37.4), and women from a household that are headed by a female (AOR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1-1.7) had higher odds to deliver through CS. Women from the Upper East (AOR =0.4; 95% CI = 0.2-0.7) and Upper West (AOR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2-0.8) regions had lower odds to deliver their children through CS. Women with parity 4 or more (AOR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.2-0.5) had lower odds of CD compared to those with parity 1. Women with female babies had lower odds (AOR = 0.8; CI = 0.7-0.9) of delivering them through CS compared to those with male children.

conclusionThe percentage of women delivering babies through the CS in Ghana is high. The high rates of CD noted do not essentially indicate good quality care or services. Hence, health facilities offering this medical protocol need to adopt comprehensive and strict measures to ensure detailed medical justifications by doctors for performing these caesarean surgeries.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyFemaleGhanaHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedOdds RatioPregnancyPrevalenceYoung AdultCaesareanDeliveryGhanaObstetricWomen

Identifiers

PMID32070303
PMCPMC7029601
OpenAlexW3012784043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.