Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32070296›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Predictive model for bacterial late-onset neonatal sepsis in a tertiary care hospital in Thailand.

Dominicus Husada, Pornthep Chanthavanich, Uraiwan Chotigeat, Piyarat Sunttarattiwong, Chukiat Sirivichayakul, Krisana Pengsaa, Watcharee Chokejindachai, Jaranit Kaewkungwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominicus HusadaDepartment of Child Health, School of Medicine Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya, 60286, Indonesia. dominicushusada@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-9546
Pornthep ChanthavanichFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Uraiwan ChotigeatQueen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piyarat SunttarattiwongQueen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chukiat SirivichayakulFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Krisana PengsaaFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Watcharee ChokejindachaiFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jaranit KaewkungwalFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is essential to prevent severe complications and avoid unnecessary use of antibiotics. The mortality of neonatal sepsis is over 18%in many countries. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for the diagnosis of bacterial late-onset neonatal sepsis.

methodsA case-control study was conducted at Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand. Data were derived from the medical records of 52 sepsis cases and 156 non-sepsis controls. Only proven bacterial neonatal sepsis cases were included in the sepsis group. The non-sepsis group consisted of neonates without any infection. Potential predictors consisted of risk factors, clinical conditions, laboratory data, and treatment modalities. The model was developed based on multiple logistic regression analysis.

resultsThe incidence of late proven neonatal sepsis was 1.46%. The model had 6 significant variables: poor feeding, abnormal heart rate (outside the range 100-180 x/min), abnormal temperature (outside the range 36

conclusionA predictive model and a scoring system were developed for proven bacterial late-onset neonatal sepsis. This simpler tool is expected to somewhat replace microbiological culture, especially in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMaleModels, BiologicalNeonatal SepsisRisk FactorsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityTertiary Care CentersThailandAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial late-onset neonatal sepsisPredictive modelScoring systemThailand

Identifiers

PMID32070296
PMCPMC7029566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.