Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32070283›Full record

Trial reportBMC emergency medicine2020

Oxygen therapy in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction based on the culprit vessel: results from the randomized controlled SOCCER trial.

Arash Mokhtari, Mahin Akbarzadeh, David Sparv, Pallonji Bhiladvala, Håkan Arheden, David Erlinge, Ardavan Khoshnood

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01423929 (Supplemental Oxygen in Catheterized Coronary Emergency Reperfusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01423929 phase4completednot on this map

Supplemental Oxygen in Catheterized Coronary Emergency Reperfusion

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2012 to 2016Enrolled100ConditionsST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionArmsOxygen, Room air
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arash MokhtariDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Mahin AkbarzadehDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Emergency and Internal Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Akutmottagningen, EA10, SUS Lund, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
David SparvDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Pallonji BhiladvalaDepartment of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Håkan ArhedenDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
David ErlingeDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Ardavan KhoshnoodDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Emergency and Internal Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Akutmottagningen, EA10, SUS Lund, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. ardavan.khoshnood@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-3142-4119
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOxygen (O

methodsThis was a two-center, investigator-initiated, single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial at the Skåne university hospital, Sweden. A simple computer-generated randomization was used. Patients were either randomized to standard care with O

resultsA total of 229 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 160 of them were randomized to the oxygen or air arm. Because of primarily technical problems with the CMRI, 95 patients were included in the final analyses; 46 in the oxygen arm and 49 in the air arm. There were no significant differences between patients with LAD and Non-LAD as culprit vessel with regard to their allocation (oxygen or air) with regards to MSI, MaR, IS and hs-cTnT.

conclusionThe results indicate that the location of the culprit vessel has probably no effect on the role of supplemental oxygen therapy in STEMI patients.

trial registrationSwedish Medical Products Agency (EudraCT No. 2011-001452-11) and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT01423929).

Indexed as

AgedComorbidityCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOxygen Inhalation TherapyPercutaneous Coronary InterventionSeverity of Illness IndexSingle-Blind MethodST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionSwedenTroponin TTroponin TCardiac magnetic resonance imagingHigh-sensitive troponin TInfarct sizeLeft anterior descending arteryMyocardial infarctionMyocardial salvage indexMyocardium at riskOxygenRandomized controlled trialsST elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID32070283
PMCPMC7027294
OpenAlexW3010373543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.