Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32070270›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Phytochemical and comparative transcriptome analyses reveal different regulatory mechanisms in the terpenoid biosynthesis pathways between Matricaria recutita L. and Chamaemelum nobile L.

Yuling Tai, Xiaojuan Hou, Chun Liu, Jiameng Sun, Chunxiao Guo, Ling Su, Wei Jiang, Chengcheng Ling, Chengxiang Wang, Huanhuan Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Comprehensive Study of Therapeutic Applications of Chamomile.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Mechanism Action of German Chamomile (Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuling TaiSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Xiaojuan HouSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Chun LiuBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Jiameng SunSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Chunxiao GuoSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Ling SuSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Wei JiangSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Chengcheng LingSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Chengxiang WangSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Huanhuan WangSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Guifang PanSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Xiongyuan SiSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Yi YuanSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China. zhiwuxue239@163.com.
Anhui Agricultural University · CNBGI Group (China) · CN

Funding

Botany Teaching Team of Department of Education Anhui Province 2014jxtd008Key Discipline of Botany of Anhui Agricultural University 2013zdxk-01Science fund for youths in Anhui province 1808085QC57Team of Development and Utilization of Medicinal Plant Resources of Anhui Agricultural University 2014TSTD005The stability and the introduction of talent research funding from Anhui Agricultural University yj2017-28
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMatricaria recutita (German chamomile) and Chamaemelum nobile (Roman chamomile) belong to the botanical family Asteraceae. These two herbs are not only morphologically distinguishable, but their secondary metabolites - especially the essential oils present in flowers are also different, especially the terpenoids. The aim of this project was to preliminarily identify regulatory mechanisms in the terpenoid biosynthetic pathways that differ between German and Roman chamomile by performing comparative transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses.

resultsWe determined the content of essential oils in disk florets and ray florets in these two chamomile species, and found that the terpenoid content in flowers of German chamomile is greater than that of Roman chamomile. In addition, a comparative RNA-seq analysis of German and Roman chamomile showed that 54% of genes shared > 75% sequence identity between the two species. In particular, more highly expressed DEGs (differentially expressed genes) and TF (transcription factor) genes, different regulation of CYPs (cytochrome P450 enzymes), and rapid evolution of downstream genes in the terpenoid biosynthetic pathway of German chamomile could be the main reasons to explain the differences in the types and levels of terpenoid compounds in these two species. In addition, a phylogenetic tree constructed from single copy genes showed that German chamomile and Roman chamomile are closely related to Chrysanthemum nankingense.

conclusionThis work provides the first insights into terpenoid biosynthesis in two species of chamomile. The candidate unigenes related to terpenoid biosynthesis will be important in molecular breeding approaches to modulate the essential oil composition of Matricaria recutita and Chamaemelum nobile.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeBiosynthetic PathwaysChamaemelumComputational BiologyGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGene Expression ProfilingMatricariaMolecular Sequence AnnotationOils, VolatilePhytochemicalsProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsSequence Analysis, RNATerpenesOils, VolatilePhytochemicalsTerpenesChamomileComparative transcriptomicsEssential oilTerpenoid biosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID32070270
PMCPMC7029581
OpenAlexW3010444760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.