ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Effects of Different Doses of Pralidoxime Administered During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and the Role of α-Adrenergic Receptors in Its Pressor Action.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pralidoxime improves the hemodynamics and survival of rats with peritonitis-induced sepsis.PloS one · 2021Article
- Effects of Different Doses of Pralidoxime Administered During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and the Role of α-Adrenergic Receptors in Its Pressor Action.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background We previously reported that pralidoxime facilitated restoration of spontaneous circulation by potentiating the pressor effect of epinephrine. We determined the optimal dose of pralidoxime during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and evaluated the involvement of α-adrenoceptors in its pressor action. Methods and Results Forty-four pigs randomly received 1 of 3 doses of pralidoxime (40, 80, or 120 mg/kg) or saline placebo during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including epinephrine administration. Pralidoxime at 40 mg/kg produced the highest coronary perfusion pressure, whereas 120 mg/kg of pralidoxime produced the lowest coronary perfusion pressure. Restoration of spontaneous circulation was attained in 4 (36.4%), 11 (100%), 9 (81.8%), and 3 (27.3%) animals in the saline, 40, 80, and 120 mg/kg groups, respectively (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.